HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 3714, etc. - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2951-end ed. Hardin A. Aasand
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
3714 Ham. No by this hand.5.2.258
3715-6 King. Giue them the foiles young Ostricke, | cosin Hamlet, 3715-6
3716 You knowe the wager.
mtby2 1723-33? ms. notes in pope1
mtby2
3716 cosin] Thirlby (ms. notes in Pope, ed. 1723 [1723-33?]): “Was this left out [in Pope1] to make the verses fit? Why might not cousin Hamlet end a verse? v. ad v. seq.[see the following 3717],:
1869 tsch
tsch
3716 cosin] Tschischwitz (ed. 1869): “cousin enstanden aus lat. consobrinus, ist höfischer Ausdruck für Verwandter im Allgemeinen.” [“cousin derives from the Latin consobrinus, is a polite expression for relatives in general.”]
1872 cln1
cln1
3716 cosin] Clark & Wright (ed. 1872): “See 1.2.64 (244).”
1885 macd
macd
3714 MacDonald (ed. 1885): “—not ‘by these pickers and stealers,’ his oath to his false friends. [2206].”
macd
3715 Ostricke] MacDonald (ed. 1885): “Plainly a favourite with the king.—He is Ostricke always in the Q.
1934 cam3
cam3
3715 Wilson (ed. 1934): “I assume from l. 304 [3784] that Osric is an accomplice in the plot, the arrangements of which were, I think, as follows: the poisoned and unbated sword was brought in with the bated foils, from which it was indistinguishable except on close scrutiny, and placed upon a side-table; at the K.’s command Osric then brings foward a few of the latter and the fencers take their choice; whereupon the K. engaged Ham. in conversation, while Laer., complaining of the foil he has selected, goes to the table and picks up the fatal weapon. It was the duty of the judges to see that everything was in order, so that the unbated sword could not have been introduced without the knowledge of one of them—a point the Eliz. audience would appreciate, while significant glances on the part of the K., Laer. and Osric while the scheme went forward would make everything clear.”
1936b cam3b
cam3b
3715 Wilson (2nd ed. 1936, Additional Notes): “A.H.J. Knight in ‘Der bestrafte brudermord and Hamlet, Act v’ (M.L.R. July, 1936, pp. 385ff.) shows that Phantasmo (Osric) was certainly an accomplice in the Brudermord.”
1982 ard2
ard2 : contra cam3
3715`Jenkins (ed. 1982): “dover Wilson’s assumption that Osric is an accomplice in the plot is unsupported by text or plausibility; and it is not a play in which the guilty go unpunished. ((Yet, transfomred into Phtasmo, he has become an accomplice in BB)).”
3714 3715 3716