HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 3657, etc. - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2951-end ed. Hardin A. Aasand
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
3657+4 {he sends to know if your pleasure hold to play with Laertes, or that}5.2.198
3657+5 {you will take longer time?} 3657+5
1843 col1
col1 : standard
3657+1-+13 Enter a Lord . . . me] Collier (ed. 1843) : “From the entrance of this lord, to his exit, the text is only to be found in the quartos. It is to be traced in the quarto, 1603.”
1857 elze1
elze1
3657+1-+10 Enter Lord . . .]Elze (ed. 1857, 258): <p. 258>"Dieser ganze §. Bis: Exit Lord, fehlt in den Fs. In QA findet sich eine Spur davon in den Worten: The king and her majesty, with the rest of the best judgment in the Court, Are coming downe into the outward pallace." ["This entire section to ’Exit Lord’ is absent in the Ff. In Q1 one finds a trace of it in the words: ’The king and her majesty, with the rest of the best judgment in the court, Are coming downe into the outward pallace."
1858 col3
col3 = col1
3657+1-+13 Enter a Lord . . . me]
1861 wh1
whi
3657+1-+10 Enter Lord . . .] White (ed. 1861) : “the 4to. of 1603 preserves fragments of Hamlet’s and Horatio’s conversation.”
1872 cln1
cln1
3657+1-+13 Clark & Wright (ed. 1872): “Omitted in the folios”
1885 macd
macd
3657+4-3657+5 MacDonald (ed. 1885): “The king is making delay: he has to have his ‘union’ ready.”
1934 Wilson
Wilson
3657+1-3657+13 Wilson (1934, 1:32): <p. 32> “As for the other cut, it possesses the theatrical merit of saving a part, seeing that it altogether suppresses the lord, who follows Osric and does nothing but repeat the message and the question with which the latter had been charged. Shakespeare probably introduced this lord in order to show us that when Osric ‘re-delivered’ Hamlet’s reply to the King, the latter found him even more difficult to follow than hamlet had, and was therefore forced to send a second emissary to discover his meaning. But the Osric business is over-long in any event, and it is difficult not to regard the F1 cut as a definite improvement. The only serious loss is the message from the Queen bidding Hamlet ‘use some gentleman entertainment to Laertes’ before they ‘fall to play’. </p. 32>
1934 cam3
cam3
3657+4 he sends to know] Wilson (ed. 1934): “Apparently Osric had not been able to ‘re-deliver’ Ham. to the ‘effect’ he intended (vv. ll. 179-81) [3643-46].”
1980 pen2
pen2
3657+4 that] Spencer (ed. 1980): “if.”
1985 cam4
cam4
3657+1-3657+13 Edwards (ed. 1985): “This passage is not found in F, which thus dispenses with an additional character not necessary to the play.”
1987 oxf4
oxf4 : Wilson
3657+1-3657+13 Hibbard (ed. 1987, Appendix A, p. 368): <p. 368>“Even Dover Wilson admits that the excision of these lines, which serve no useful purpose and require an extra speaking actor, is ‘a definite improvement’ ((MSH p. 32)).”
oxf4 : Abbott
3657+4 that] Hibbard (ed. 1987, Appendix A, p. 368): <p. 368>“if ((Abbott 285)).”
1988 bev2
bev2: standard
3657+4 that]
3657+4 3657+5