HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 3588, etc. - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2951-end ed. Hardin A. Aasand
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
3588 Ham. I {humble} <humbly> thanke you sir.5.2.82
3588 Doost know this water fly?
3589 Hora. No my good Lord.
1765 john1
john1
3589 water fly] Johnson (ed. 1765) : “A waterfly skips up and down upon the surface of the water, without any apparent purpose or reason, and is thence the proper emblem of a busy trifler.”
1773 v1773
v1773 = JOHN1
3589 water fly]
1778 v1778
v1778 = v1773
3589 water fly]
1784 ays1
ays1 = v1778 w/o attribution
3589 water fly]
1785 v1785
v1785 = v1778
3589 water fly]
v1787 ann
ann = v1785
3589 water fly]
1790 mal
mal = v1785
3589 water fly]
1791- Rann
rann
3589 water fly] Rann (ed. 1791-) : “fluttering insect, this busy trifler.”
1793 v1793
v1793 = v1785 + magenta underlined
3589 water fly] Holt White (apud Steevens, ed. 1793) :Water-fly ? is in Troilus and Cressida used as a term of reproach, for contemptible from smallness of size. ‘How (says Thersites) the poor world is pestered with such water-flies ; diminutiues of nature.’ Water-flies are gnats. This insect in Chaucer denotes a thing of no value. Canterbury Tales , v. 17203, Mr. Tyrwhitt’s edition: ‘Not worth to thee as in comparison The mountance [ualue] of a gnat .’ HOLT WHITE”
1803 v1803
v1803 = v1793
3589 water fly]
1813 v1813
v1813 = v1803
3589 water fly]
1819 cald1
cald1 : v1813 (john1 only)
3589 water fly]
1821 v1821
v1821 = v1813
3589 water fly]
v1821
3589 water fly] Boswell (ed. 1821, 21:Glossary): “a term of contempt.”
1826 sing1
sing1 ≈ v1821 (minus JOHNSON)
3589 water fly] Singer (ed. 1826) : “In [Tro.5.1.34 (2902)], Thersites says, ‘How the poor world is pestered with such water-flies; diminutives of nature.’ The gnats and such like ephemeral insects are not inapt emblems of such busy triflers as Osrick.”
1832 cald2
cald2 = cald1 ; v1821 (HOLT WHITE note without attribution)
3589 water fly] Caldecott (ed. 1832) : Of such Thersites, speaking of Patroclus, says ‘the world is pestered,’ i.e. encumbered. [Tro. 5.1.34(2902)]
1854 del2
del2
3589 water fly] Delius (ed. 1854) : “water-fly, als Ausdruck der Verachtung, kommt auch in Troilus and Cressida [Tro. 5.1.? (0000)] [“water-fly as an expression of contempt, appears also in [Tro. 5.1.34 (2902)]”
1856 hud1 (1851-6)
hud1 = sing1 without attribution
3589 water fly]
1856 sing2
sing2 = sing1
3589 water fly]
1857 elze1
elze1
3588 water fly] Elze (ed. 1857, 252-3): <p. 252>"’Water flies, erklärt Holt White, are gnats.’ Eine Mücke aber dient bei Chaucer C.T. 17203 ed. Tyrwhitt, gerade wie hier ’water-fly’, zur Bezeichnung gänzlicher Unbedeutendheit und Werthlosigkeit: ’Not worth to thee as in comparison The mountance ((==value)) of a gnat.’ Johnson erklärt die auf der Oberfläche des Wassers hin- und herspringenden ’Wasserfliegen’ für das geeignetste Sinnbild eines geschäftigen Müssiggängers. Was sind aber ’Wasserfliegen’? Wir sind überzeugt, dass Shakespeare ein ganz bestimmtes Insekt im Sinne gehabt hat, vermuthlich die Eintagsfliegen ((Ephemera)), welche an schönen Sommer- und Herbsttagen meist beim Untergang der Sonne an den Ufern den Flüsse und Seen oft in ungeheuern Schwärmen auf und ab fliegen, oft jedoch schon nach einigen Studen sterben. Füf ihre Ähnlichkeit mit dem Höflinge ist vielleicht noch anzuführen, dass sie in verschiedenen Farben schillern und sich gern an stehendend Gewässern aufhalten. S. </p. 252.<P. 253> Gräfe Handbuch der Naturgeschichte (9Leipzig, 1836)) I, 818.—Auch in Troilus and Cressida V,1 wird ’water-flies’ als Ausdruck der Verachtung gebraucht: Ah how the poor world is pestered with such water-flies, diminutives of nature."</p. 253>[ "Water-flies," Holt White explains, "are gnats." But a gnat serves Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales directly here as "water-fly," for the representation of complete uselessness and worthlessness: ’Not worth to thee as in comparison. The mountance ((==value)) of a gnat.’ Johnson explains the here and there leaping over the surface of the water as the suitable imade of an affected, useless gopher ["busy trifler"]. But what are these waterflies? We are convinced that Shakespeare has a very certain insect in mind, presumably the [one day fly?] ((Ephemera)), which fly here and there on the beautiful summer and autumn days mostly in the setting of the sun at the shores of rivers and seas in enormous swarms, often dying however already in a single hour. For its kinship with the court, perhaps still continues or leads that they are irridescent in differing colors and gladly stand in standing waters. See Gräfe Handbook of Natural History ((Leipzig, 1836)) I, 818.—Also in [Tro. V.1. was ’water-flies’ used as an expression for contempt: Ah how the poor world . . ."].
1864-68 c&mc
c&mc
3588 water fly] Clarke & Clarke (ed. 1864-68, rpt. 1874-78): “Any one who has watched the busy yet light skimmong of the winged insects that flit upon the surface of pools, will verify the exact appropriateness of this epithet for the court flutterer, Osric.”
1869 tsch
tsch
3588water fly] Tschischwitz (ed. 1869): “waterfly=libellula.”
1872 del4
del4 = del2
3589 water fly]
1872 cln1
cln1 : ≈ v1821 (john1 definition ; Tro. //) +
3589 water fly] Clark & Wright (ed. 1872): “The name is given to several kinds of flies haunting water in Mouffet’s Theater of Insects , ed. 1658, p. 943.”
1872 hud2
hud2=hud1
3589 water fly]
1877 v1877
v1877 = john1 ; ≈ cln1(only “The name . . . Theater of Insects, ed. 1658, p. 943”)
3589 water fly]
1877 neil
neil ≈ standard +
3589 water fly] Neil (ed. 1877, Notes): “busy trifler. The water fly is really a small beetle, living in the water. They may been seen dimpling the surface of almost any pool on a sunny day, as they glide with rapidity and ease in mazy circles, diving down when disturbed and carrying with them a bright little bubble of air. the form of each is surrounded with an iridescent luminous ring. Perhaps the ephemeræ, which fling off their pupa-case very soon, assume a new form, and exist but for a brief interval, may be meant. Robert Paterson suggests that it is the Gyrinus natator, or water-flea, one of the nimble, frolicsome ‘diminutives of nature.’ See [Tro. 5.1.34 (2902)]. In [Ant. 5.2.59 (3266)], the term is used for an insect we should now call a flesh-fly.”
1881 hud3
Hud3 ≈ hud2; = john1
3589 water fly] Hudson (ed. 1881): “In [Tro. 5.1.34 (2902)], Tersites says of Patroclus, ‘How the poor world is pestered with such water-flies, diminutives of Nature!’ As Johnson says, ‘A water-fly skips up and down upon the surfaces of the water without any apparent purpose or reason, and is thence the proper emblem of a busy trifler.”
1885 macd
macd: in collation line, I have entered that macd has 3588 directed to Horatio.
1890 irv2
irv2 : standard (v1877 for john1?)
3589 water fly] Symons (in Irving & Marshall, ed. 1890): “Compare [Tro. 5.1.34 (2902)]:’Ah, how the poor world is pester’d with such waterflies,—diminutives of nature!’ Johnson sensibly takes water-fly to be the emblem of a busy trifler, from its way of dancing aimlessly to and fro ovr the surface of the water.”
1899 ard1
ard1 : standard
3589 water fly]
1931 crg1
crg1 ≈ standard
3589 water fly]
1934 cam3
cam3 : standard ; john1
3589 water fly] Wilson (ed. 1934)
cam3 = john1
3589 water fly] Wilson (ed. 1934, Glossary)
1939 kit2
kit2 ≈ standard
3589 water fly]
1937 pen1a
pen1a : standard
3589 water fly]
1947 cln2
Cln2 ≈ standard
3589 water fly]
1951 crg2
crg2=crg1
3589 water fly]
1974 evns1
evns1 ≈ standard
3589 water fly]
1980 pen2
pen2 ≈ standard
3589 water fly]
1982 ard2
ard2 ≈ standard +
3589 water fly] Jenkins (ed. 1982, Longer Notes, 558-9): <p. 558>“Cf. also the ‘flies’ ((‘fashion-mongers’)) of [Rom. 2.4.32 (1135)]. There may be an influence of Nashe’s description of a Dane in Pierce Penniless ((see Intro., pp. 104-06)): ‘he is the best fool braggart under heaven . . . his apparel is so puffed up with bladders of taffety, and his back like beef stuffed with parsley, so drawn out with ribands and devices, and blistered with light sarcenet bastings, that you would think him nothing but a swarm of butterflies, if you saw him afar off’ ((Nashe, I. 177-8)). There are obvious hints for a costume-designer, and </p. 558> <p. 559>Dover Wilson supposes that Osric may have worn the winged doublet then in fashion.”</p. 559>
1984 chal
chal : standard ; Q2VN
3589 water fly]
1985 cam4
cam4 ≈ john1
3589 water fly]
1987 oxf4
oxf4
3589 water fly] Hibbard (ed. 1987): “Precisely which of the many flies that frequent water Hamlet has in mind it is hard to say. The dragon=fly seems the most likely. In [Tro. 5.1.32-3] water-flies are regarded as worthless nuisances.”
1992 fol2
fol2≈ standard
3589 water fly]
3588 3589