HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 3396-97 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2951-end ed. Hardin A. Aasand
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
3396-7 buried, Alexander re|turneth {to} <into> dust, the dust is earth, of earth vvee 
1805 Seymour
Seymour
3395-9 Alexander . . . Beare-barrell] Seymour (1805, 2:199) : <p. 199> “This is false logic: though loam is made of earth, all earth does not become loam: we should read, ‘and why of this earth, whereto he was converted—’or else, ‘and why of this loam, to which he may have been converted,’ &c.”</p. 199>
1858 col3
col3: Perkins F2, 1632
3396-7 returneth to dust] emended to return to dust] Collier (ed. 1858): “So the corr. fo. 1632: folio, 1623,” Ed. note: Collier justifies his emendation with reference to the ’correction’ in the Perkins folio, which he himself fabricated. See mcol1 in bib of mss.
2004 DiMatteo
DiMatteo: Erasmus
3396-3404 DiMatteo (2004, para. 17): “Hamlet’s irreverent allusions in the graveyard scenes to ’imperious Caesar dead and turned to clay (5.1.213-14) and to the classical archetype of the emperor, Alexander, tap into a humanist, folly-promoting cynicism regarded the pretences of imperial power to answer only to its own inscrutable will, claiming to outlast time and nature’s sway. As does Erasmus, Hamlet mixes jocularity and insight, indicating his own views on the philosophy of sovereignty in his graveyard remarks. He holds up to his friend Horatio his own mirror of magistrates, revealing a genealogy of power greater than that of the greatest royalty of classical culture: [quotes 3396-9]. .”
3396 3397