HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 3125 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2951-end ed. Hardin A. Aasand
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
3125 Most generous, and free from all contriuing, 31254.7.135
1854 del2
del2
3125 Most . . . contriuing] Delius (ed. 1854) : “er hat keine Ahnung von einem Anschlag. Welcher Anschlag gemeint iest, sagen die folgenden Zeilen. Hamlet wird in seiner Arglosigkeit den Fechtdegen nicht genauer untersuchen, so dass Laertes leicht, order doch mit Hülfe eines kleinen Kunstgriffs, fÅr das stumpfe Rapier ein unabgestumpftes Schwert nehmen und damit an Hamlet den Tod des Polonius vergelten kann.” [“Hamlet has no notion of the plot, which the following lines explain. Hamlet will expect nothing in his unsuspecting manner from the fencing. So, Laertes can, with a little trick, take an unbated sword for a bated rapier and with that, pay back Hamlet for the death of Polonius.”]
1872 del4
del4 = del2
3125 Most . . . contriuing]
1870 rug1
rug1
3125 Moberly (ed. 1873): “Oliver, in [AYL], while plotting his brother’s death, cannot help saying, ‘Yet he’s gentle; never schooled and yet learned; full of noble device,’ &c. He has not got so far in his wickedness as the king here, who only thinks of Hamlet’s generosity as an implement for his overthrow. But Laertes shews by his horrid suggestion of the poison how little need there was for the king to prepare the temptation as carefully as he had done.”
1873 rug2
˙rug2=rug1
3125 Moberly (ed. 1873): “Oliver, in [AYL], while plotting his brother’s death, cannot help saying, ‘Yet he’s gentle; never schooled and yet learned; full of noble device,’ &c. He has not got so far in his wickedness as the king here, who only thinks of Hamlet’s generosity as an implement for his overthrow. But Laertes shews by his horrid suggestion of the poison how little need there was for the king to prepare the temptation as carefully as he had done.”
1877 v1877
v1877
3125 peruse] Furness (ed. 1877): “See 2.1.90 [0000].”
1885 mull
mull
3125 contriuing] Mull (ed. 1885): “scheming.”
mull : contra mob
3125 generous] Mull (ed. 1885): “The Rugby editor [mob] mistakenly says, ‘The King only thinks of Hamlet’s generosity as an implement for his overthrow.’ It is not the generosity of Hamlet, but his being of most noble birth, and consequently unsuspicious as well as free from all scheming, that the King infamously calculates upon. See my Emendations and remarks, pp. xxxiii.—xxxv. [see n. 539]”
1929 trav
trav:
3215 Travers (ed. 1929): “Ingenuously seIf-condemning praise by a villain of his intended victim was one ((cp. p. 107 n. 8 [1705))of the simplicities of Elizabethan stage technique. Here e.g. it made the coming catastrophe ‘most’ sympathetically intelligible.”
1939 kit2
kit2
3125 generous] Kittredge (ed. 1939): “noble-minded. The frankness of the King’s praise of Hamlet for qualities that are the opposite of those here shown by Laertes, indicates how sure he now feels of his accomplice.”
kit2 ≈ standard
3125 generous] Kittredge (ed. 1939, Glossary):
1951 alex
alex ≈ standard
3125 generous] Alexander (ed. 1951, Glossary)
1974 evns1
evns1≈ standard
3125 generous]
1980 pen2
pen2
3125 Spencer (ed. 1980): “Claudius is not speaking the truth, for he knows that Hamlet has already engaged in a complicated contrivance, The Mousetrap.”
1982 ard2
ard2
3125 generous] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “large-minded, magnanimous. Cf. [5.2.238 (0000), 1.3.74 (0000)].”
1987 oxf4
oxf4 : Tilley
3124-6 he . . . foyles] Hibbard (ed. 1987): “Compare ‘They that think none ill are soonest beguiled’ ((Tilley T221)).”
oxf4 : OED
3125 generous] Hibbard (ed. 1987): “noble-minded ((OED 2b)).”
1988 bev2
bev2 ≈ standard
3125 generous]
1992 fol2
fol2≈ standard
3125 generous]
3125