HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 3015 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2951-end ed. Hardin A. Aasand
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
3015 As by your safetie, {greatnes}, wisdome, all things els 4.7.8
1857 elze1
elze1=
3015 greatnes] Elze (ed. 1857): "FA lässt ’greatness’ aus und macht dadurch den Vers zu einem regelrechten Fünffüssler." [F1 omits ’greatness’ and thus makes the verse into a regular five-footer.]
1860 Walker
Walker
3015 greatnes] Walker (1860, 3:269) : <p. 269> “I think we should expunge greatness. We might indeed arrange,—’As by Your safety, greatness,’ &c. But this seems much too harsh.” </p. 269>
Walker
3015 greatnes] Lettsom (apud Walker, 1860, 3:269): “So the folio [excision of greatnes].”
1872 del4
del4
3015 greatnes] Delius (ed. 1872) : “Die Qs. fügen hinter safety noch greatness ein, was in der Fol. fehlt.” [“The Qs insert greatnes behind safety, which is absent in the Folio.”]
1872 cln1
cln1
3015 As . . . els] Clark & Wright (ed. 1872): “The quartos read ‘safety, greatness,’ which makes this line an Alexandrine. But this is no grave objection, as the next line is Alexandrine also.”
1877 v1877
v1877 ≈ cln1; ≈ Walker
3015 As . . . els] Clark & Wright (apud Furness, ed. 1877): “The Qq make this line an Alexandrine. But this is no grave objection, as the next line is Alexandrine also.”
1882 elze2
elze2: elze1
3015 greatnes] Elze (ed. 1882): “The phrase all things else, like any thing, usually follows the asyndetic enumeration of several synonym or parallel substantives; compare e.g. [Tam. 3.2.233 (1640)]; [Tem.1.1.68 (78)], where Hanmer’s most ingenious emendation ling, heath, broom, burze has undoubtedly hit the nail on the head. Sometimes, indeed, such an enumeration or series is confined to an asyndeton of two words, as in [Com. 5.1.144 (1616)], and in [Ant. 1.2.1 (80)]; in so far, therefore, the reading of [F1] might be maintained. It is,however, difficult to understand, for what reason greatnes should have been inserted in [Q2], if it was not contained in the original MS, whereas the pretext for its suppression in [F1] is apparent, viz.the editor’s wish to reduce the line to a regular blank verse. [sic].”
1890 irv2
irv2 : standard
3015 greatnes] Symons (in Irving & Marshall, ed. 1890): “Qq have safety, GREATNESS, wisdom, which makes the line an Alexandrine. Probably greatness and wisdom were alternative readings, inserted together by mistake.”
1934 Wilson
Wilson (1934, 2:261): greatnes om. GLO, CAM1, Ard1
1934 cam3
cam3 : standard
3015 greatnes]
1939 kit2
kit2
3015 safetie] Kittredge (ed. 1939): “regard for your own safety.”
1956 Sisson
Sisson
3015 greatnes] Sisson (1956, 2:225): <p. 225> “Folio omits greatness, and editors follow, including apparently Alexander, but not New Cambridge [Cam3]. The argument for following Folio is that the line is metrically improved, though [3016] is equally hypermetrical. But, apart from the authority of Quarto, greatness is as necessary an idea here as safety or wisdom.” </p. 225>
1974 evns1
evns1 ≈ standard
3015 safetie]
1980 pen2
pen2 evns1
3015 safetie]
pen2
3015 greatnes] Spencer (ed. 1980): “This word is omitted in F, probably in order to reduce the line to ten syllables.”
pen2
3015 wisdome]Spencer(ed. 1980): “political prudence.”
1982 ard2
ard2 ≈ pen2
3015 greatnes] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “[greatnes] I take to be a rejected first thought ((cf. Intro., p. 41)). Considerations of the King’s greatness enhance the importance of his safety, but the idea is superseded by wisdom and included in all things else.”
ard2
3015 greatnes] Jenkins (ed. 1982, Introduction, 41) uses this line to suggest that greatnes was a compositor’s inclusion of a rejected reading in Shakespeare’s autograph.
1985 cam4
cam4ard2 w/o attribution +
3015 greatnes] Edwards (ed. 1985): “I assume that once again Q2 preserves a Shakespearean false start. Claudius is ‘stirred up’ to take action on account of his safety and by persuasion of his wisdom. ‘greatness’ seems irrelevant.’”
1987 oxf4
oxf4 ≈ standard
3015 safetie]
oxf4
3015 greatnes] Hibbard (ed. 1987): “The Q2 reading safetie, greatnes, wisdome, resulting in a six-foot line, looks like a first attempt which Shakespeare then tidied up by omitting greatness as redundant.”
3015