HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 3078+1 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2951-end ed. Hardin A. Aasand
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
3078+1 {Laer. My Lord I will be rul’d,} 3078+14.7.69
1872 Hudson
Hudson
3078+1ff Hudson (1872, p. 296): <p. 296>“In regard to the death of his father, he [Laertes] snatches eagerly at the conclusion shaped for him by the King, without pausing to consider the grounds of it, or to weigh the merits of the case, because it offers a speedy chance of discharging his revenge; and he is reckless alike of means and of consequences, in fact cares nothing for others or even for himself, here or herafter, so he may quickly ease his breast of the mad rapture with which it is panting. He has a buring resentment of personal wrongs, real or supposed, but no proper sense of justice; indeed, he can nowise enter into any question of so grave a nature as that: hence, in the exigency that overtakes him, ‘wild sword-law’ becomes at once his religion.” </p. 296>
1934 Wilson
Wilson
3078+1-3078+16, 3099+1-3099+2, 3112+1-3112+10 Wilson (1934, 1:31): <p. 31> “The long scene between Claudius and Laertes, in which the plot against Hamlet is laid and the fencing-math arranged, contains yet another group of cuts (4.7.69-82, 101--3, 115-24), running in all to twenty-six lines. The theatre loses nothing by their omission; the first expressing the King’s rather old-fashioned views upon duelling, the second consisting of a couple of lines upon ‘scrimers’ in France, and the third being a gnomic passage built up round a somewhat far-fetched quibble on the word ‘plurisy’. It may be said, in short, that if twnety-six lines had to be sacrified in this scene, the choice was well made.” </p. 31>
3078+1