HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 2878 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2023-2950 ed. Frank N. Clary
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
2878 To hell allegiance, vowes to the blackest deuill,4.5.132
1723- mtby2
mtby2
2878 blackest] Thirlby (1723-): “if this was changed [[by pope to black]] for the sake of the verse, as I believe it was, it was a strange change to be made by a poet, & especially by so good a poet.”
Transcribed by BWK.
1733 theo1
theo1: Warburton
2878 Theobald (ed. 1733): “Laertes is a good Character; but he is here in actual Rebellion. Least, therefore, this Character should seem to sanctify Rebellion, instead of putting into his Mouth a reasonable Defence of his Proceedings, such as the Right the Subject has of shaking off Oppression, the Usurpation, and the Tyranny of the King, &c. Shakespeare gives him Nothing but absurd and blasphemous Sentiments: such as tend only to inspire the Audience with Horror at the Action. This Conduct is exceeding nice. Where in his Plays, a Circumstance of Rebellion is founded on History, or the Agents of it infamous in their Characters, there was no Danger in the Representation: But as here, where the Circumstance is fictitious, and the Agent honourable, he could not be too cautious. For the Jealousie of the Two Reigns, he wrote in, would not dispense with less Exactness. Mr. Warburton.”
1733- mtby3
mtby3
2878 Thirlby (1733-), “How cd he, the motive being only a false & groundless opinion of a private wrong . . . . v. Warburton’s note p. 446. 32-41.”
Transcribed by BWK, who adds: “Thirlby is commenting on warb’s comment in Theobald (ed. 1733),” but notes that “perhaps Thirlby misunderstood Warburton’s point. W says that Sh offers no valid defense for Laertes’ treason.” She further notes: “Warburton means that Sh purposely made Laertes’ rebellion baseless lest because he is a good character the audience and royals think that Sh is sponsoring rebellion. I wonder, though, if Sh means Laertes to be such a good character. The fact that he does rebel over what he perceives as a private wrong removes some sympathy, doesn’t it?”
1747-53 mtby4
mtby4 = mtby2
1810-13 mclr1
mclr1 ≈ theo1 (Warburton); xref.
2878 Coleridge (ms. notes 1813 in Theobald, ed. 1773; rpt. Coleridge, 1998, 12.4:744): <p. 744>“Mercy on Warburton’s notions of goodness—see p. 219, especially after the King’s description of Hamlet—‘He being remiss, most generous & free from all contriving.’ [4.7.135 (3125)]—”<p./ 744>
1857 fieb
fieb
2878 allegiance] Fiebig (ed. 1857): “Allegiance, the duty of subjects to the government; loyalty, or fidelity.”
1870 rug1
rug1
2878 To hell allegiance] Moberly (ed. 1870): To hell, allegiance!] “Laertes’ father is far indeed from being like Hamlet’s; he has no assurance that the king is guilty of his death: yet, the moment he hears of it, he rushes headlong from France, sweeps to his revenge with lightning speed, gathers and excites the people, and is ready to strike the king down all in a moment. This shews the man of action, which Hamlet would fain have been and of whom he expresses approval in [5.2.75 (3579)]; one who would never ’think too precisely on the event’; one in whom the ’hue of resolution would never be sicklied over by the pale cast of thought.’ Immeasurably superior to Laertes in every other point, in this one Hamlet stands far below him; and nothing can be more finely imagined than the contrast.”
1873 rug2
rug2 = rug1
1935 ev2
ev2
2878 Boas (ed. 1935): “I care not what happens n this world or the next.”
1993 dent
dent: Romans analogue
2878 To hell allegiance] Andrews (ed. 1993): “What Laertes says here and in the following lines is that he is prepared to forswear his Christian faith, and particularly the injunction that subjects leave vengeance to God and obey their rulers (see Romans 12, 13), and risk damnation in order to avenge his father’s death.”
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2: 1068-9 xref
2878-9 Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “Laertes rhetorically consigns both his allegiance to the King and his grace of his standing with God to hell (see Polonius’ conventional association of duty to God and duty to the King at 2.2.44-5 [1068-9]).”
2878