HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 2842 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2023-2950 ed. Frank N. Clary
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
2842 Ore-beares your Officers: the rabble call him Lord,4.5.103
1857 fieb
fieb: Tollet, Walker
2842 rabble] Fiebig (ed. 1857): “The rabble, the crowd or mean people, now called the mob, a word Shakspeare could not use in this meaning; for Tolle[t] tells us, that in the latter end of the reign of King Charles II, the rabble that attended the Earl of Shaftesbury’s partisans was first called mobile vulgus, and afterwards by contraction the mob; and ever since the word has become proper English. To which J. Walker adds, that in Addison’s time this word was not yet adopted; for he says, [Spectator, No. 135). ‘I dare not answer that mob, rep, pos, incog, and the like will not in time be looked upon as part of our tongue.”
1858 col3
col3: xref.
2842 the . . . Lord] Collier (ed. 1858): “We make no change here, but the corr. fo. 1632 would warrant us in changing ‘lord’ to king; perhaps the meaning of the rabble was the same, but afterwards they are represented as exclaiming ‘Laertes shall be king’ [4.5.107 (2846)]. Perhaps it ought to be king in both places.”
1869 tsch
tsch: Mueller
2842 rabble] Tschischwitz (ed. 1869): “lat. rabula. S. Ed. Mueller II. p. 228.” [Latin rabula. See Ed. Mueller II. p. 228.]
1877 v1877
v1877: col2
2842 Lord] Furness (ed. 1877): “Collier (ed. 2): The (mS) would warrant us in changing ‘lord’ to king; perhaps the meaning of the rabble was the same, but afterwards they are represented as exclaiming ‘Laertes shall be king [2846].’ Perhaps it ought to be king in both places.”
1907 Werder
Werder
2842–8 young Laertes . . . King] Werder (1907; rpt. 1977, pp. 23-24): <p.23 > “Why does Shakespeare exhibit Laertes quite easily raising the people against the King? Why but to show how much more easily Hamlet, whom the people loved, could </p.23> <p.24> have done the same thing, if that was the plan he preferred?—The petty revolt stirred up by Laertes was a minor incident in Shakespeare’s plot, and had no other significance. It is absurd to suppose that Hamlet could have accomplished his task ‘much more easily’ in any such way. He knew better than to attempt it.”</p.24 >
1980 pen2
pen2
2842 Officers] Spencer (ed. 1980): “household servants and guards.”
1993 dent
dent: xrefs.
2842 Ore-beares] Andrews (ed. 1993): “Overwhelms. Compare lines [4.5.96, 100 (2833, 2839)].”
2842