HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 2846 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2023-2950 ed. Frank N. Clary
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
2846 {The} <They> cry choose we, Laertes shall be King,4.5.107
1770 Gentleman
Gentleman: xrefs.
2846-8] Gentleman (1770, 1:26-7): <p.26> “Laertes is ushered in with a strange insinuation importing no less than a proposition to chuse him King; how this became necessary, or is reconcileable I cannot see as in a preceding scene the King says, that he cannot enforce any law against Hamlet on account of the murder committed because ‘He’s loved . . . offence’ [4.2.4-7 (2665-8]. Nay speaking of the matter afterwards to Laertes, the king delivers himself thus ‘Why . . . graces’ [4.7.17-21 (3025-9)]. Now if Hamlet was so extremely popular, how is it possible to suppose the Laertes by complaining of a private injury, shold supersede him in the people’s favours, and gain their voices to the prejudice </p.26><p.27> of his birth right besides Laertes’s attack upon, and language, to a monarch, without knowing a syllable of the matter he contends about, makes him an absolute drawcansir equally the foe of justice, reason, and decorum; indeed the author seems to have been sensible of this, making the king say ‘Will you, in revenge of your dear father’s death Destroy both friends and foes?’”
1773 gent1
gent1
2846 choose we, Laertes] Gentleman (ed. 1773): “Though Laertes has great provocation to rouse him, yet such peremptory violent and abusive behaviour to his sovereign, breaks through the bounds of decorum and allegiance, unpardonably; and we by no means see why the rabble offer to chuse him King.”
1774 gent2
gent2 = gent1
1774 capn
capn
2846 choose . . . King] Capell (1774, 1:1:143): “This is chang’d by the moderns without authority from any one copy, into—chuse we Laertes for our King; by which they have effac’d in great measure the vestige of another true reading, namely—‘work’ in the line next before: For this ‘Choose we,’ or, Let us choose, is the act that was unprop’d by ‘antiquity,’ (ancient usage or custom) which plac’d the election of a king in the senate perhaps, or nobles, and not in the people: ‘work’ is—work of such a sort as the people were about to proceed to.”
1857 fieb
fieb
2846 choose we] Fiebig (ed. 1857): “Let us make choice.”
1875 Marshall
Marshall: Gervinus, v1821
2846 They cry . . . King] Marshall (1875, p. 195): “It would seem that, with ‘the rabble’ at least, the popularity of Claudius had been short-lived. His accession was probably more owing to the nobles than to the people: they had wished to place young Hamlet on his father’s throne; and now that he had been sent off by Claudius to England, in order, as they thought, to get rid of him as a successor, the people clamoured to be allowed to choose for themselves and to make Laertes King: Gervinus credits the energy of Laertes with the creation of this ‘rebellion, which looks giant-like;’ but it is probable that he found the work of creation at least half-done: the fact that Hamlet had been sent out of the kingdom had more to do with their riotous attitude than any love either of Laertes himself or of his father, who had been so mysteriously killed. On the question as to whether the Crown of Denmark was elective or not, see an interesting note given in Malone’s ‘Shakespeare’ (ed. 1821, vol. vii, p. 209). I must here point out one touch of Shakespeare’s art which I have omitted to notice in the text. Immediately there is any mention of rebellion the Queen is as zealous for her husband’s cause as if she had never heard anything to shake her faith in him and weaken her affection; this is right; for after all she had chosen him as her lover, and, once married to him, it is more noble in her to be true to him with all his vices than to plot against him, as she proposes her readiness to do in the suppressed scene of the Quarto. 1603.”
1885 macd
macd; xref.
2846 MacDonald (ed. 1885): “This refers to the election of Claudius—evidently not a popular election, but effected by intrigue with the aristocracy and the army: ‘They cry, Let us choose: Laertes shall be king!’
“We may suppose the attempt of Claudius to have been favoured by the lingering influence of the old Norse custom of succession, by which not the son but the brother inherited. See n. [1.2.31 (210)].”
1980 pen2
pen2
2846 choose . . . King] Spencer (ed. 1980): “Claudius had intimated that Hamlet was the people’s favourite [4.3.4-5 (2664-5)]. The fickleness of the multitude is illustrated by their support for Laertes when the opportunity is offered. The demand Choose we! Is remarkable. It implies that the election of Claudius was an oligarchic move, not a popular one. But Laertes soon comes to terms with Claudius, and this hint of a democratic revolt is immediately forgotten.”
1982 ard2
ard2: Belleforest; xref.
2846 choose . . . King] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “Denmark was an elective monarchy and in Belleforest Hamlet himself became king by public proclamation after he had killed his uncle. But this proclamation of Laertes against a reigning monarch is in defiance of all precedent (4.5.104-106 (2843-5)].”
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2: 2845 xref; Jenkins
2846 They cry] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “Q2’s ’The cry’ could mean ’the cry is’, but Jenkins prefers F, and the scribe or compositor might have been misled by 105 [2845], which begins with The.”

ard3q2: 2665 xref; Edwards
2846 Choose we] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “’The distracted multitude who were supposed to love Hamlet (4.3.4 [2665]) have given their allegiance to Laertes, and are demanding to take over the prerogative of the electoral body which made Claudius king’ (Edwards)..”

ard3q2: Cor //
2846 shall] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “Compare Cor 3.1.89-90: ’Hear you this Triton of the minnows? Mark you / His absolute "shall"?’”
2846