HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 2743+27 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2023-2950 ed. Frank N. Clary
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
2743+27 {And spur my dull reuenge. What is a man} {K3v}4.4.34
1885 macd
macd
2743+27-2743+33 What . . . vnused] MacDonald (ed. 1885): “I am in doubt whether this passage from ‘What is a man’ down to ‘unused,’ does not refer to the king, and whether Hamlet is not persuading himself that it can be no such objectionable thing to kill one hardly above a beast. At all events it is far more applicable to the king: it was not one of Hamlet’s faults, in any case, to fail of using his reason. But he may just as well accuse himself of that too! At the same time the worst neglect of reason lies in not carrying out its conclusions, and if we cannot justify Hamlet in his delay, the passage is of good application to him. ‘Bestial oblivion’ does seem to connect himself with the reflection: but how thoroughly is the thing intended by such a phrase alien from the character of Hamlet!”
1907 Werder
Werder
2743+27 spur . . . reuenge] Werder (1907; rpt. 1977, p. 156): “‘And spur my dull revenge’—yes, ‘spur,’ but not from lack of his own courage, but rather because of their nature! This delay oppresses him—the situation which he calls ‘beastly,’ which benumbs his reason, for he does not know how he can use it in the service of his revenge.”
1982 ard2
ard2: Cicero; xref.
2743+27-2743+28 What. . . more] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “The essential distinction between man and beast lies in man’s possession of reason (l.38), lacking which the beast ins actuated only by the sense (Cicero, De Officiis, i.iv.11). Cf. [1.2.140 (324) ln, 1.2.150 (334) ln].”
1987 oxf4
oxf4: Marston analogue
2743+27-2743+29 What . . . more] Hibbard (ed. 1987, Appendix): “There seems to be an echo here of some lines from Marston’s Histriomastix: ‘What (i.e. How) is a man superior to a beast/But for his mind? Nor that ennobles him/While he dejects his reason, making it/ The slave into his brutish appetite’ (Harvey Wood, 3.248). The idea was, of course, a commonplace of the time; but Shakespeare’s phrasing of it is remarkably close to Marston’s.”
2743+27