HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 2427 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2023-2950 ed. Frank N. Clary
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
2427 And {sets} <makes> a blister there, makes marriage vowes3.4.44
1778 v1778
v1778: MM //; xref.
2427 sets . . . there] Steevens (ed. 1778): “Sets a blister there, has the same meaning as in MM: ‘Who falling in the flaws of her own youth, Hath blister’d her report.’ See a note on this passage, [2.3.12 (965)]. Steevens.”
1784 ays1
ays1 = v1778 (xref only)
1785 v1785
v1785 = v1778
1790 mal
mal = 1785
1793 v1793
v1793 = v1778
1803 v1803
v1803 = v1793
1813 v1813
v1813 = v1803
1821 v1821
v1821 = v1813
1857 fieb
fieb
2427 blister] Fiebig (ed. 1857): “The blister as a token of ugliness and moral deformity, opposite to the rose of beauty of innocent love.”
1872 del4
del4
2427 sets] Delius (ed. 1872): “Für sets hat die Fol. makes, wahrscheinlich ein durch das folgende makes veranlasster Druckfehler.” [For sets the Folio has makes, probably a printing error caused by the following makes.]
1872 cln1
cln1: Err. //
2427 sets . . . there] Clark and Wright (ed. 1872): “brands as a harlot. Compare Err. [2.2.140 (535)].”
1877 v1877
v1877 = cln1
1878 rlf1
rlf1: cln1 (Err. //) + xref. magenta underlined
2427 sets a blister there] Rolfe (ed. 1878): “Wr. explains this, ‘brands as a harlot,’ and refers to Err. [2.2.140 (535)]. Cf. [4.5.119 (2862)] below.
1890 irv2
irv2 ≈ cln1 (incl. Err. //)
2427 sets . . . there] Symons (in Irving & Marshall, ed. 1890): “An allusion to the practice of branding harlots on the forehead. Compare Err [2.2.140 (535)], and see note 48.”
1899 ard1
ard1 ≈ cln1 (Err. //); ≈ rlf1 (xref.)
2427 sets . . . there] Dowden (ed. 1899): “Clar. Press: ‘brands as a harlot.’ Compare [4.5.119 (2862)], and Err. [2.2.140 (535)].”
1903 rlf3
rlf3 = rlf1
1930 Granville-Barker
Granville-Barker
2427-8 makes marriage vowes . . . oathes] Granville-Barker (1930, rpt. 1946, 1: 229): These words tell “her plainly that he knows of her adultery.” Granville-Barker explains her continued protestation in 2435-6 not as ignorance of what Hamlet means but as her lack of understanding of the significance of her crime: paraphrasing her, he writes “But it is past and respectably atoned for; and there is genuine perplexity to her ’Ay me what act, That roars so loud and thunders in the index?’ [2436]” And again, paraphrasing, he writes: “What can she have done to warrant such tremendous execration?” Ed. note: G-B highlights by his contortions to show her guilt the alternative, that she is innocent of adultery, if not of incest and a too-hasty marriage.
1931 crg1
crg1 = ard1 (def. only)
2427 sets a blister] Craig (ed. 1931): “brands as a harlot.”
1937 pen1
pen1 = crg1
1939 kit2
kit2 ≈ rlf1 xref.
2427 a blister] Kittredge (ed. 1939): “a brand of infamy. Cf. [4.5.119-120 (2862-64)] ”
1957 pel1
pel1 ≈ kit2 minus xref.
2427 blister] Farnham (ed. 1957): “brand (of degradation).”
1974 evns1
evns1 ≈ pel1
2427 blister] Evans (ed. 1974): “brand of shame.”
1982 ard2
ard2: xref.; MM //
2427 a blister] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “Whores were traditionally branded on the forehead. Cf. [4.5.119 (2862-3)]. In MM [2.3.12 (965)] Juliet has ‘blister’d her report’.”
1984 chal
chal ≈ kit2 (xref. only)
2427 blister] Wilkes (ed. 1984): “cf. [4.5.119 (2862-3)].”
1988 bev2
bev2 = crg1
1997 evns2
evns2 = evns1
2003 ShSt
Parker: 2423, 2426, 2543 xref
2427 Parker (2003, p. 130): “The contrast of black and ’faire’ in Hamlet’s portraits of two brothers is thus joined by the adulterous declining of the queen--described in F and Q2 as an ’act’ that sets a ’blister’ or blemish on the ’faire’ forehead of an ’innocent loue’ (166-67). Q1’s ’Forbear the adulterous bed to night’ (172) makes even clearer the attempt by her son to remove her from the adulterate mingling or mixture of coupling with this second husband.”
2427