HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 2359 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2023-2950 ed. Frank N. Clary
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
2359 But in our circumstance and course of thought,3.3.83
1791- rann
rann
2359 in our circumstance] Rann (1791-): “from what has occurred I fear.”
1819 cald1
cald1
2359 circumstance] Caldecott (ed. 1819): “Measure or estimate of what may have reached us.”
1832 cald2
cald2 = cald1
1857 fieb
fieb
2359 circumstance . . . thought Fiebig (ed. 1857): “In our circumstance of thought, i.e. according to the state of affairs as we think it to be.”
1866 ktlyn
ktlyn
2359 circumstance] Keightley (ed. 1866, glossary): “circumlocution.”
1869 tsch
tsch
2359 course of thought] Tschischwitz (ed. 1869): “Nach unseren Verhältnissen und Begriffen.” [According to our circumstances and ideas.]
1872 del4
del4
2359 Delius (ed. 1872): “Nach menschlichen Verhältnissen und Gedanken zu schliessen, steht es bedenklich mit ihm.” [On the basis of human conditions and thoughts, his condition is serious.]
1872 cln1
cln1: xrefs.; contra del2; TGV, Tro..//s
2359 our circumstance . . . thought] Clark and Wright (ed. 1872): “i.e. the circumstance and course of our thought. We have a similar use of the possessive pronoun, [1.4.73 (662)], and [3.2.328 (2207)]. Delius however joins ‘our’ to circumstance,’ explaining thus: ‘to conclude according to human relations and thoughts.’ But the words will hardly bear this meaning. In the TGV [1.1.36 (40)], and in Tro. [3.3.114 (1966)], ‘circumstance’ means the details of an argument. So here ‘circumstance of thought’ means the details over which thought ranges and from which its conclusions are formed.”
1877 v1877
v1877 ≈ cald1, del2, cln1
2359 our . . . thought] Furness (ed. 1877): “Both Caldecott and Delius connect ‘our’ with ‘circumstance,’ the former paraphrasing: ‘the measure or estimate of what may have reached us,’ the latter, ‘according to human relations and thoughts.’ Clarendon, on the other hand, connects ‘our’ with ‘thoughts,’ and paraphrases: ‘the circumstance and course of our thought,’ adding, ‘We have a similar use of the possessive pronoun, [1.4.73 (662)]; [3.2.328 (2207)].’ In TGV [1.1.36 (40)], and Tro [3.3.114 (1966)], ‘circumstance’ means the details of an argument. So here ‘circumstance of thought’ means the details over which thought ranges, and from which its conclusions are formed.”
1878 rlf1
rlf1: del2; cln1 (TGV //); xref.
2359 in our . . . thought] Rolfe (ed. 1878): “From our human point of view and according to our line of thought; or ‘according to human relations and thoughts’ (Delius). For circumstance = condition, state of things, cf. TGV [1.1.36 (40)]: ‘So, by your circumstance, I fear you’ll prove.’ See also [1.3.102 (568)] above.”
1881 hud2
hud2 ≈ cln1 without attribution
2359 circumstance . . . thought] Hudson (ed. 1881): “‘Circumstance and course of thought’ seems to mean the particular data or circumstantial detail of things from which our thought shapes its course and draws its conclusions.”
1890 irv2
irv2 ≈ cln1
2359 circumstance . . . thought] Symons (in Irving & Marshall, ed. 1890): “i.e., as the Clarendon Press edd. rightly take it, in the circumstance and course of our thought. Compare [3.2.328 (2207)]: ‘your cause of distemper,’ i.e. the cause of your distemper. Circumstance is used, as often in Shakespeare, for details.”
1891 dtn
dtn
2359-60 But in . . . him] Deighton (ed. 1891): “but so far as we can judge by looking at the matter from all points of view, things are in an evil plight with him.”
dtn
2359 our . . . thought] Deighton (ed. 1891): “is equivalent to the circumstantial course of our thought, the course of our thought which goes round and round the subject and views it in all its particulars.”
1899 ard1
ard1 ≈ cln1 minus //s+ magenta underlined
2359 circumstance . . . thought] Dowden (ed. 1899): “our mortal condition and the course of our thought. Or ‘circumstance’ may be connected with ‘thought,’ our thought in its indirect indications and its general tendency.”
1903 rlf3
rlf3=rlf1 minus del2 for in our . . . thought
1904 ver
ver
2359 in our . . . thought] Verity (ed. 1904): “so far as we can roughly judge; according to the general drift and range of our opinions. I think that circumstance (one of the most difficult words in Shakespeare) has much the same idea as in [3.1.1 (1648)]; implying that our thought cannot hit the absolute truth of the matter but approaches it more or less closely.
“Some interpret ‘in our mortal condition and in (or ‘according to’) the range of our thoughts.’ This really gives two senses (by zeugma) to the preposition.”
1929 trav
trav ≈ ver (xref.)
2359 in our . . . thought] Travers (ed. 1929): “may mean: either so far as the roundabout approaches (cp. [3.1.1 (1648)] and range of our thought enable us to judge; or (with a longer pause after “circumstance”) in our earthly condition and according to the course our thought takes in consequence.”
1931 crg1
crg1 ≈ ard1
2359 in . . . course] Craig (ed. 1931): “as we see it in our mortal situation.”
1934 cam3
cam3
2359 in our . . . thought] Wilson (ed. 1934): “i.e. as all evidence and speculation shows; cf. G. ‘circumstance’ and [2.2.157 (1188)].”
1939 kit2
kit2
2359 in our . . . thought] Kittredge (ed. 1939): “judging as well as our circumstances allow, and letting our thoughts take their natural course, we must conclude, etc. ‘Our course of thought’ is contrasted with God’s complete knowledge; and what makes the difference is ‘our circumstance,’ i.e., the fact that we are mere men.”
1947 cln2
cln2
2359 Rylands (ed. 1947): “i.e. according to our evidence and speculation.”
1947 yal2
yal2
2359 in . . . thought] Cross & Brooke (ed. 1947): “according to our vague ideas.”
1974 evns1
evns1
2359 in . . . thought] Evans (ed. 1974): “i.e. to the best of our knowledge and belief.”
1980 pen2
pen2
2359 our circumstance . . . thought] Spencer (ed. 1980): “The exact meaning is difficult to decide, but roughly interpreted, Hamlet is saying ‘so far as we, here on earth, can judge’ or ‘according to our evidence and speculation’.”
1982 ard2
ard2
2359 in our circumstance] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “as it appears to our limited earthly vision.”
1985 cam4
cam4: xrefs.
2359 circumstance . . . thought] Edwards (ed. 1985): “’circumstance’, as at [1.5.127 (819)] and [3.2.76 (1927)], has the sense of circuitous or circling discourse. The construction here is the familiar Shakespearean use of two nouns for an adjective and a noun, i.e. ‘circumstantial course of thought’ = our course of thought which is necessarily indirect.”
1988 bev2
bev2 ≈ crg1
2359 in . . . thought] Bevington (ed. 1988): “as we see it from our mortal perspective.”
1993 dent
dent: xref.
2359 Andrews (ed. 1993): “But given the perspective we have, based on what we know and can infer. Compare the phrasing in [1.1.67 (83)].”
1997 evns2
evns2=evns1
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2 ≈ ard2
2359 circumstance. . . thought] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “knowledge which is necessarily limited or circumstantial.”
2359