HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 1911 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 1018-2022 ed. Eric Rasmussen
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
1911 No, let the candied {tongue licke} <tongue, like> absurd pompe,3.2.60
1794 whiter
1911-13 No ... fauning] Whiter (1794, p.123n): “These passages [also Antony and Cleopatra 4.xii. 19-23; Timon of Athens 4.iii. 223-7; and Henry IV. Part I. 1.iii. 251-2.] are very singular. The curious reader will observe that the fawning obsequiousness of an animal, or an attendant, is connected with the word candy. The cause of this strange association I am unable to discover; though the reader must know but little of the human mind — of Shakspeare — or even of the ordinary doctrine of chances, if he imagines that these matters were in four passages connected by accident. [Whiter adds, in his notes, a passage from Caes., III.i. 39, which he believes to be ‘deeply impregnated with the same vein of diction and ideas.’ (Sp. 2. p.83v : Sp. 1, p. 139)]”
1832- anon.
anon
1911 absurd pompe] Anonymous [possibly Thomas Carlyle ](ms. notes, ed. 1832): “ candied pomp”
1845 hunter
hunter
1911-13 No ... fauning] Hunter (1845, p. 247): <p. 247>“Both these epithets required to be justified, yet it is not easy to do it. The passage seems to be imitated by Randolph. ‘Be not deceiv’d, I have no bended knees, No supple tongue, nor speeches steept in oil, No candied flattery, no honied words,— I come an armed Prologue.’ The Praeludium to Aristippus.”</p. 247>
1872 cln1
cln1
1911 candied] Clark & Wright (ed. 1872): “covered with a coating of hypocrisy. Compare iii. 1. 48."
absurd] Clark & Wright (ed. 1872): "In all other passages Shakespeare accents this word on the second syllable, as we do."
1881 hud2
hud2
1911 candied] Hudson (ed. 1881): “Candied is sugared; a tongue steeped in a the sweetness of adulation.”
1899 ard1
ard1
1911 candied] Dowden (ed. 1899): “sugared.”
1911