HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 1747 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 1018-2022 ed. Eric Rasmussen
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
1747 Ham. I humbly thanke you <: well, well,> well.3.1.91
1805 seymour
seymour
1747 I humbly thanke you well.] Seymour (1805, p. 175): “More deficiency: I suppose there was added— ‘—Indifferent well.’”
1841 knt1 (nd)
knt1
1747 Knight (ed. 1839): “This repetition ‘well, well, well,’ has been rejected by the earlier editors. It is not in the quartos.”
1843 col1
col1
1747 Collier (ed. 1843): “We adopt the repetition of ’well, well,’ from the folios.”
1856 hud1 (1851-6)
hud1
1747 HUDSON (ed. 1851-6): "Thus the folio; the quartos have well but once. The repetition seems very apt and forcible, as suggesting the opposite of what the word means. H."
1882 elze
elze
1747 thanke you well] Elze (ed. 1882): “The scansion of this triple well proposed by Mr Moberly ad loc. in order to fill up the line, will scarcely find favour with any editor but himself.”
1934a cam3
cam3 = dowden +
1747 Wilson (ed. 1934): “...with the same form of address he uses to the Captain in 4.4.29. [(2743+22)] and to Osric in 5.2.83. [(3588)].”
1747 Wilson (ed. 1934): “well, well, well Does the repetition imply ‘impatience’ (DOWDEN) or indefference?”
1747