HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 1621 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 1018-2022 ed. Eric Rasmussen
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
1621 Remorslesse, trecherous, lecherous, kindlesse villaine.2.2.581
1765 john1
john1
1621 kindlesse] Johnson (ed. 1765): “Unnatural.”
1773 v1773
v1773 = john1
1773 gent
gent
1621-28 Gentleman (ed. 1773): “The lines markt “ [TLN 1621-28] are sometimes, and should always be, left out, as the speech is full long enough without them.”
1784 ays
ays
1621 kindlesse] Ayscough (ed. 1784): “i.e. unnatural.”
1784 davies
davies
1621 Davies (1784, p. 60): “Besides the jingle of letcherous and treacherous, the first is become almost obsolete, and, in compliance with modern manners, should be omitted, or exchanged for a word less offensive.”
1791- rann
rann
1621 kindless] Rann (ed. 1791-): “—unnatural.”
1826 sing1
sing1
1621 Singer (ed. 1826): “Kindness is unnatural.”
1856 hud1 (1851-6)
hud1
1621 kindlesse] Hudson (ed. 1856): “Kindless is unnatural. See The Merchant of Venice, Act i. sc. 3, note 7.”
1856b sing2
sing2=sing1+
Singer (ed. 1856): “we have kindly for natural, i.e. accordance with kind, elsewhere.”
1869 romdahl
romdahl
1621 kindlesse] Romdahl (1869, p. 30): “unkind, unnatural. — The syllable less (A.S. leás, vacuus c.gen., privatus; O.E. les, lees), a very common privative suffix, added to the substantive kind (nature), has thus formed this composition, which certainly very seldom, perhaps nowhere else, occurs This suffix, although of Saxon root, is now, like most others, indiscriminately applied to radicals from all sources.”
1872 cln1
cln1
1621 kindless] Clark & Wright (ed. 1872): “unnatural. The opposite is meant by ’kindly,’ i.e. natural. See Much Ado about Nothing, iv.1. 75.
1881 hud2
hud2 = hud1+
Hudson (ed. 1881): “Observe how Hamlet checks himself in this strain of objurgation, and then, in mere shame of what he has just done, turns to ranting at himself for having ranted.”
1882 elze
elze
1621 kindlesse villaine] Elze (ed. 1882): “After this line FA contains the clumsy interpolation: Oh Vengeance! — The repetition of villaine at the end of two successive lines looks like a dittography.”
1885 macd
macd
1621 MacDonald (ed. 1885): “pitiless” “unnatural
1899 ard1
kindlesse] Dowden (ed. 1899): “unnatural.”
1621