HW Home	Previous CN	View CN	View TNM	View TNI	Next CN

Line 1403 - Commentary Note (CN)

Commentary notes (CN):

1. SMALL CAPS Indicate editions. Notes for each commentator are divided into three parts:

In the 1st two lines of a record, when the name of the source text (the siglum) is printed in SMALL CAPS, the comment comes from an EDITION; when it is in normal font, it is derived from a book, article, ms. record or other source. We occasionally use small caps for ms. sources and for works related to editions. See bibliographies for complete information (in process).

2. How comments are related to predecessors' comments. In the second line of a record, a label "without attribution" indicates that a prior writer made the same or a similar point; such similarities do not usually indicate plagiarism because many writers do not, as a practice, indicate the sources of their glosses. We provide the designation ("standard") to indicate a gloss in common use. We use ≈ for "equivalent to" and = for "exactly alike."

3. Original comment. When the second line is blank after the writer's siglum, we are signaling that we have not seen that writer's gloss prior to that date. We welcome correction on this point.

4. Words from the play under discussion (lemmata). In the third line or lines of a record, the lemmata after the TLN (Through Line Number] are from Q2. When the difference between Q2 and the authors' lemma(ta) is significant, we include the writer's lemma(ta). When the gloss is for a whole line or lines, only the line number(s) appear. Through Line Numbers are numbers straight through a play and include stage directions. Most modern editions still use the system of starting line numbers afresh for every scene and do not assign line numbers to stage directions.

5. Bibliographic information. In the third line of the record, where we record the gloss, we provide concise bibliographic information, expanded in the bibliographies, several of which are in process.

6. References to other lines or other works. For a writer's reference to a passage elsewhere in Ham. we provide, in brackets, Through Line Numbers (TLN) from the Norton F1 (used by permission); we call these xref, i.e., cross references. We call references to Shakespearean plays other than Ham. “parallels” (//) and indicate Riverside act, scene and line number as well as TLN. We call references to non-Shakespearean works “analogues.”

7. Further information: See the Introduction for explanations of other abbreviations. Click here for more information about browsing the entries and here for more information about the special symbols used in Hamletworks. Click the question mark icon above to remove this help message.

Notes for lines 1018-2022 ed. Eric Rasmussen

For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.

1403 <the Question.>	2.2.356

1881 hud2

hud2

1402 Poet...Cuffes] Hudson (ed. 1881): “Not ‘unless the poet and player’ went to fighting each other, but unlless both the writers and the actors joined together in pelting and running down the full--grown regular performers. Here, as often , argument is the subject--matter or plot of a play, and so is put for the play itself.”

1403 Question] Hudson (ed. 1881): “Question, again, is, apparently, the dialogue. So that the meaning of the whole seems to be, ‘The public would not patronize these juvenile performances, unless both the ‘eyases’ and the ‘goosequills,’ (that is, the boy--actors and their writers,) in their dialogue, went to abusing or berating the authors and actors of the ‘common stages’.’ ---CROSBY.”

1885 macd

macd

1403 Question] MacDonald (ed. 1885): “ ‘No stage-manager would buy a new argument, or prologue, to a play, unless the dramatist and one of the actors were therein represented as falling out on the question of the relative claims of the children and adult actors.’”

1899 ard1

ard1

1403 Question] Dowden (ed. 1899): Perhaps means dialogue; perhaps controversy, debate; the poet fopr the children attacks the common players.”