HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 867 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
867 As I perchance heereafter shall thinke meet,1.5.171
866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 2411
1805 Seymour
Seymour: Malone, Johnson
867-8 Seymour (1805, 2:163-4): <p. 163> “Hamlet seems to have adopted the expedient of putting on this ‘antic disposition’ from the example of Junius Brutus’s assumed fatuity, in order to prevent, until the time of execution, any suspicion, in the usurper’s mind, that he was forming a systematic plan of revenge. This revenge, as the judicious remarker quoted by Mr. Malone observes, could not be taken before the poet was prepared to end the play; yet, doubtless, it was a defect, not to exhibit some specious pretext for the delay; and the death of Claudius at last, as Dr. Johnson justly observes, </p. 163><p. 164> is produced incidentally, and not by any contrivance of Hamlet himself.” </p. 164>
The notes Seymour refers to are not associated with this doc. but with others, it appears. See Hamlet doc.
1817 Drake
Drake
867-8 Drake (1817, 2: 394): “Determined, however, if possible, to obey what seems both a commission from heaven, and a necessary filial duty; but sensible that the wild workings of imagination, and the tumult of contending emotions have so far unsettled his mind, as to render his control over it at times precarious and imperfect, and the consequently he may be liable to betray his purpose, he adopts the expedient of counterfeiting madness, in order that if any thing should escape him in an unguarded moment, it may, from being considered as the effect of derangement, fail to impede his designs.”
Also in Ham doc.
1848 Hudson
Hudson
867-8 As . . . on]: Hudson (1848, 2:104): <p. 104>“This [i.e. 867-8], if, indeed, it be not rather the anticipation of a real than the pre-announcement of a feigned insanity, seems to me a profound artifice of honesty. Hamlet cannot kill his uncle, and disdains to conciliate him; and apparent madness is the only practicable outlet of thoughts and feelings which he scorns to hide.” (/p.104).
<p. 108>“. . . Hamlet’s madnes, paradoxical and contradictory as the statement may appear, is, it seems to me, neither real nor affected, but a sort of natural and spontaneous imitation of madnes resulting from the successful though </p. 108> <p. 109> convulsive efforts of an overburdened mind to brace and stay itself under the burden. The triumphs of his reason over his passion naturally express themselves in the tokens of insanity, just as the agonies of despair naturally vent themselves in flashes of merriment. It is not so correct, therefore, to say that Hamlet puts an antic disposition on, as that he lets it on; and his pre-announcement of it seems to spring rather from foresight of a contingency than from an intention to deceive”
Hudson thinks Hamlet foresees that these antic fits will come on and “therefore determines neither to seek nor shun them, but to let them come when they will, and use them when they come” (/p.109).
1872 hud2
hud2
867-8 As . . . on] Hudson (ed. 1872): “This has been taken as proving that Hamlet’s ‘antic disposition” is merely assumed for a special purpose. But our ripest experts in the matter are far from regarding it so. They tell us that veritable madmen are sometimes inscrutably cunning in arts for disguising their state; saying, in effect, ‘To be sure, you may find me acting rather strangely at times, but you must not think me crazy; I know what I am about, and have a purpose in it.”
I put this note also in 868. Decide where it should go. See also madness in Ham. doc.
1879 Halliwell-Phillipps
Halliwell-Phillipps
867 Halliwell-Phillipps (1879, pp. 14-15): “Hamlet’s powerful intellect not only enables him to recognise almost instantaneously the difficulties which beset his path, but immediately to devise a scheme by which some of them may be overcome.”
1881 hud3
hud3 = hud2
867
1885 mull
mull ≈ Halliwell-Phillipps
867 Mull (ed. 1885, p. xxi): “Immediately after the revelations made to him by the Ghost, he announces with marked preciseness and significance his intention ‘to put an antic disposition on,’ but only [quotes 867], only as circumstances suggest the policy to ‘bear himself as strange or odd’ will he assume this ‘disposition.’ This resolution, couched in precisest language, is plainly not that of a madman, but of one having a healthy intellect, controlling an obedient will.”
1885 macd
macdmull see n. 847
867-8 MacDonald (ed. 1885): “Very speedily he grows quiet: a glimmer of light as to the course of action necessary to him has begun to break upon him: it breaks from his own wild and disjointed behaviour in the attempt to hide the conflict of his feelings—which suggests to him the idea of shrouding himself, as did David at the court of the Philistines, in the cloak of madness: thereby protected from the full force of what suspicion any absorption of manner or outburst of feeling must occasion, he may win time to lay his plans. Note how, in the midst of his horror, he is yet able to think, plan, resolve.”
1885 macd
macd
867 MacDonald (ed. 1885): “The idea, hardly yet a resolve, he afterwards carries out so well, that he deceives not only king and queen and court, but the most of his critics ever since: to this day they believe him mad. Such must have studied in the play a phantom of their own misconception, and can never have seen the Hamlet of Shakspere. Thus prejudiced, they mistake also the effects of moral and spiritual perturbation and misery for further signs of intellectual disorder—even for proof of moral weakness, placing them in the same category with the symptoms of the insanity which he simulates and by which they are deluded.”
1903 rlf3
rlf3
867 Rolfe (ed. 1903, p. 326): “ . . . it is the consciousness of his repeated loss of self-control [right after the ghost left and through the following scene], rather than any plan he forms of feigning insanity, which prompts the hint that he may hereafter think meet to ‘put an antic disposition on.” He does not think that Hamlet could have so quickly formed a plan. Realizing that the nervous excitement into which he has fallen could “happen again,” he asks his companions not to hint at what they might reveal.”
1939 kit2
kit2
867-8 Kittredge (ed. 1939, p. xiii) thinks the reason for Hamlet’s pretense of madness is obvious. It’s not to protect himself from harm as was the case in the source story but to glean evidence against the king and queen, whom he hoped would speak openly before him, expecting him to be incapable of understanding them. But since the queen knew nothing of the murder, as he after learns [2411], the king and queen never speak of it in his presence.
1992 fol2
fol2: standard
867-8 As I . . . on] Mowat & Werstine (ed. 1992): “since I may in the future think it appropriate to act bizarrely”
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2: standard
867 thinke meet] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “decide, see fit”