HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 859 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
859 Ham. Well sayd olde Mole, can’st worke {it’h earth} <i’th’ ground> so fast,1.5.162
1874 Corson
Corson: F1, cam1 +
859 it’h earth] Corson (1874, p. 16): “‘ground’ seems preferable with reference to ‘mole.’”
Why?
1880 Tanger
Tanger
859 it’h earth] Tanger (1880, p. 126) ascribes the variant in F1 as “probably due to the critical revision which the text received at the hands of H.C. [Heminge & Condell], when it was being woven together from the parts of the actors.”
1934 Wilson
Wilson MSH
859 earth] Wilson (1934, p. 62) believes that the F1 variant is a recollection of ground in 853.
Ed. note: However, the variant could also result from the consideration that earth and platforms do not work together.
1935 Wilson
Wilson WHH: Scot; Lavater
859-60 Wilson (1935, p. 81): Hamlet’s epithets olde Mole and Pioner bring to mind both Scot’s and Lavater’s references to spirits in mines.
1982 ard2
ard2:
859 Mole] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “See 845 CN ”
1999 SQ
de Grazia
859 de Grazia (1999, p. 251): Hegel called a spirit a mole, something that “Hamlet did . . . more than two centuries before . . . to the spirit of his father after it has slipped back underground, interred once again, the time allotted him to roam above now up. And from that subterranean region, he four times repeats Hamlet’s injunction to his companions to swear to secrecy. What makes it necessary for Hamlet to repeat the oath is that the spirit is directly beneath the swearers.”
Ed. note: See 845 for an example of the men moving towards the ghost in performance.
2000-1 Caird
Caird
859 olde Mole] Caird (2000-1 stage production with Simon Russell Beale): Hamlet’s disrespect for his father’s spirit in the "Old Mole" sequence has been variously explained away; Caird and Beale suggest Hamlet’s disrespect for Sylvester Morand’s ghost derives from anger at his ranting revelations. The ghost’s demand is likely to result in Hamlet’s death--as Beale’s Hamlet realizes even if the ghost does not.
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2: DeGrazia
859-60 Mole . . . Pioner] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “Hamlet compares the Ghost to a burrowing animal or to a soldier who digs to lay mines. De Grazia demonstrates how Hegel and Marx used Hamlet’s metaphor of the mole to represent the emergence of modern consciousness (de Grazia, ’Teleology’ [1991, 251-67] . . .).”
845 859