HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 777 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
777 Ham. O all you host of heauen, ô earth, what els,1.5.92
1736 Stubbs
Stubbs
777-96 Stubbs (1736, p. 24) “Hamlet’s Soliloquy, after the Ghost has disappeared, is such as it should be.”
1770 Gentleman
Gentleman ≈ Stubbs without attribution
777-96 Gentleman (1770, 1:19): “Hamlet’s ensuing soliloquy is very natural, and highly expressive of the impression left upon him. . . .”
1789 Anon.
Anon: Kemble
777-96 Anon. (1789, p. 14): “His behaviour on the departure of the Ghost presents us with a fine picture of filial reverence.”
1819 mCLR2
mCLR2:
777-96 O. . . . sworn’t] Coleridge (ms. notes, 1819, in Ayscough, ed. 1807): “I remember nothing equal to this burst unless it be the first effect of Prometheus, after the exit of Vulcan & the two Afrites, in Eschylus. But Shakespear alone could have produced the vow of Hamlet to make his memory a blank of all maxims & generalized truths, that observation had copied there; followed by the immediate noting down the generalized fact, that one may smile and smile and be a villain.”
[I like this, but isn’t it possible that Hamlet wipes away trivial records and this one, having to do w the king, is not trivial? I’ve always taken it that way, but C’s way, Hamlet is more mercurial, less fixed and stable.] Coleridge probably published this comment-and depending on its date, we will use it above.
1819 Coleridge
Coleridge
777-96 Coleridge (1819, rpt. 1987, 5.2:299-300): <p.299> “I remember nothing equal to this burst unless it be the first speech of Prometheus, after the exit of Vulcan & the two Afrites, in Eschylus. </p. 299> <p. 300> But Shakespear alone could have produced the Vow of Hamlet to make his memory a blank of all maxims & generalized truths, that Observation had copied there, followed by the immediate noting down the generalized fact, that one may smile and smile and be a villain.” </p. 300>
1852 N&Q
Brae, see n. 792
777-96
1856 hud1
hud1 = mCLR with slight variations in magenta
777-96 Hudson (ed. 1856): “I remember nothing equal to this burst unless it be the first speech of Prometheus, in the Greek drama, after the exit of Vulcan and the two Afrites. But Shakespear alone could have produced the vow of Hamlet to make his memory a blank of all maxims and generalized truths, that ‘observation had copied there,’— followed immediately by the speaker noting down the generalized fact, ‘That one may smile and smile and be a villain. Coleridge. H.”
hud1 puts his note at 793
1859 Werder
Werder
777-95 Werder (1859, trans. 1907, pp. 85-6) <p. 85> thinks that Hamlet is at his most “distracted” after the Ghost’s revelations</p. 85> <p. 86> but that his speech is not raving. </p. 86>
1872 hud2
hud2 = hud1
777-96
1875 Marshall
Marshall
777-96 Marshall (1875, pp. 21-2): <p. 21>“The echo of the spirit’s sad farewell . . . has scarcely died away before the tension of nerves from which Hamlet has suffered during that most pathetic address is relieved by that outburst of passionate emotion, which, singular to state, most of the representatives of Shakespeare’s Hamlet, on the stage, have either omitted to a great extent, or have deformed into a mere interjection: [quotes 777-96]
“Here we have at once the evidence of Hamlet’s titanic strength of feeling and the foreshadowing of that convulsion </p. 21><p. 22> of the mind which renders his simulation of madness almost a necessity. He seems to feel that the task imposed upon him is so terrible that he can find no room in his life for any other pursuit, affection, or passion.” </p. 22>
1875 Marshall
Marshall
777-80 Marshall (1875, p. 127): “The violent aspiration with which [the soliloquy] commences—[quotes 778-8 through hell] is succeeded by the expression—‘O, fie!’ which recalls to our memories the words in the former soliloquy—‘Fie on’t ah fie!’ [319]. Here the exclamation may be taken in two ways; either as a self-rebuke for the mention of hell, or as a reproach directed against his own weakness on the part of Hamlet. I think the latter the best interpretation, especially if we consider the words which follow immediately—[quotes through stiffly up].
His remarks on this soliloquy continue in doc. 778-80
1877 v1877
v1877 = mclr2
777-96
1883 Gervinus
Gervinus
777-886 Gervinus (1883, pp. 552-3): <p. 552> “ . . . in this first soliloquy it strikes us with surprise that the man so apparently resolute should immediately call on his heart to ‘hold,’ and to his sinews to ‘grow not instant old, but to bear him stiffly up;’ and that, in the deepest emotion, he should lament that time was ‘out of joint,’ and that he was born ‘to set it right.’ It is strange that he does not at once impart his secret to the friends to whom his father had appeared, and only subsequently to one of them, namely, to Horatio; that </p. 552><p.553 > he chooses far-fetched means for a matter so simple, feigning himself mad like Brutus, when there was no mighty tyranny to overthrow; that he fortifies himself against the doubt and suspicion of those who held him in fear, and that by this very means he attracts observation to his actions and excites the distrust of the king, whom the desponding sadness of his step-son has already disquieted.”
1935 Wilson
Wilson WHH
777-8 Wilson (1935, p. 72) points out that Ham. never mentions purgatory—only heaven and hell. While he seemed to accept the spirit on its own terms while it was present, as soon as it leaves hell begins to gape. </ p. 72>
Wilson (p. 73) says that after the play-within all his doubts disappear. See p. 79 for an allusion in purgatory in 829.
1980 pen2
pen2
777 host of heauen] Spencer (ed. 1980): “(angels).”
1982 ard2
ard2
777-8 O . . . hell] Jenkins (ed. 1982, p. 155) < p. 156> argues that the many references to the ghost’s diabolical nature do not prove that revenge is wrong. Though Hamlet recognizes that its promptings come from heaven, earth (nature) and even hell, he accepts the ghost as his father. Jenkins believes it would be wrong to ignore any of these elements. . . . And the command to revenge, coming from father to son and not one for nature to resist, is enforced by a power beyond nature in which it would seem that heaven and </ p. 155>< p. 156> hell conjoin.” </ p. 156>
777