HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 708 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
708 If thou did’st euer thy deare father loue.1.5.23
1773 gent
gent
708 Gentleman (ed. 1773):“This speech (this line? the whole speech?] may be styled a most melting, heart-rending sense-alarming address.”
Ed. note: See also n. 694
1805 Seymour
Seymour
708-9 Seymour (1805, 2:159): “This apostrophe by Hamlet I have always considered as interpolated; it is not, indeed, an unnatural exclamation, but it is unnecessary, and interrupts the meter—It was, I doubt not, the gratuitous ejaculation of one of the actors, and so taken down by the transcriber.”
1877 v1877
v1877 ≈ Seymour
708-9
1939 kit2
kit2: standard
708-9 Kittredge (ed. 1939): "This [the ghost’s] adjuration with Hamlet’s reply, suggests the tender affection which existed between father and son."
1977 Teaching Sh.
Beckerman
708, 719, 766 Beckerman (1977, pp. 312-13): <p. 312> "This broad pattern [described in CN 743] has secondary impulses such as the Ghost’s repeated challenge to Hamlet: [quotes 708, 719 And duller shouldst thou be then the fat weede, 766 If thou hast nature in thee beare it not]. </p.312> <p. 313> Such secondary impulses function within the context of the primary movement of a scene [the telling and the reaction] . . . but it is the primary line that determines the dramatic shape." </p. 313>
1999 Kliman
Kliman
708-9 The period at the end of 708 in Q2 and F1 and 709 in Q2 suggest that Hamlet interrupts the ghost and that in turn the ghost interrupts him. Seymour and Van Dam argue for interpolation.
694 708 709 719 766