HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 702 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
702 Make thy two eyes like stars start from their spheres,1.5.17
1780 mals1
mals1
702 stars start from their spheres] Steevens (apud 1780, 1:676 n. 4): “We meet in Hamlet the same image as here: ‘Make thy two eyes, like stars, start from their spheres.’ [Son. 119.7-8] Steevens.”
1790 mal
mal = Steevens in mals1 without attribution and with error
702 stars . . . spheres] Malone (ed. 1790): “So, in our poet’s 108th [sic; should be 119] sonnet: ‘How mine eyes out of their spheres been fitted, In the distraction of this madding fever!’ Malone’ ”
1793 v1793
v1793 = mal
702 stars . . . spheres]
Even the mistaken reference to Son. 108 with credit to Malone rather than to Steevens; this is so strange.
1803 v1803
v1803 = v1793
702 stars . . . spheres]
1813 v1813
v1813 = v1803
702 stars . . . spheres]
1819 cald1
cald1 = mal on Son. 108
702 stars . . . spheres]
1821 v1821
v1821 = v1813
702 stars . . . spheres]
1826 sing1
sing1 = v1821
702 stars . . . spheres]
1832 cald2
cald2 = cald1
702 stars . . . spheres]
1856 sing2
sing2 = cald1
702 stars . . . spheres]
1870 Abbott
Abbott § 350
702-4 Make . . . start . . . to part . . . to stand] Abbott (§ 350): “‘To’ omitted and inserted in the same sentence. The to is often omitted in the former of two clauses and inserted in the latter, particularly when the finite principal verb is an auxiliary or like an auxiliary. . . . [quotes 702-3, italicizing Make to show that it is like an auxiliary].”
1877 v1877
v1877: Abbott, xref 874 (on superfluous to)
702-4 Make . . . start . . . to part . . . to stand]
1904 ver
ver
702 spheres] Verity (ed. 1904): “used by Shakespeare of the orbits of the stars.”
1939 kit2
kit2
702 thy two eyes] Kittredge (ed. 1939): "The formality of this dual [i.e., I think he means ’doubling’] fits the solemnity of the Ghost’s address."

kit2 = ver without attribution + Ptolemey
702 like stars . . . spheres] Kittredge (ed. 1939): "Each planet (according to Ptolemaic astronomy) was fixed in a hollow sphere concentric with the earth and revolving about it as a centre."
1947 cln2
cln2 = ver without attribution
702 spheres] Rylands (ed. 1947): "orbits of the spheres."
1957 pel1
pel1 ≈ kit2 without attribution
702 spheres] Farnham (ed. 1957): “transparent revolving shells in each of which, according to the Ptolemaic astronomy, a planet or other heavenly body was placed.”
1970 pel2
pel2 = pel1
702 spheres] Farnham (ed. 1970): “transparent revolving shells in each of which, according to the Ptolemaic astronomy, a planet or other heavenly body was placed”
1980 pen2
pen2: xref
702 spheres] Spencer (ed. 1980): “(in which the heavenly bodies normally moved: see the note to 4.7.15).”
1985 cam4
cam4
702 Edwards (ed. 1985): "i.e. make your eyes start from your head as though they were stars jerked out of their appointed spheres (so indicating a dislocation in nature)."
1987 oxf4
oxf4
702 spheres] Hibbard (ed. 1987): "sockets. There was a close connection in Shakespeare’s mind between stars, each enclosed within its socket. See [Rom. 2.2.14-16 (807-9)], ‘Two of the fairest stars in all the heaven, Having some business, do entreat her eyes To twinkle in their spheres till they return.’ "
1988 bev2
bev2: standard
702 spheres] Bevington (ed. 1988): “i.e., eye-sockets, here compare to the orbits or transparent revolving spheres in which according to Ptolemaic astronomy, the heavenly bodies were fixed.”
1992 fol2
fol2: standard
702 stars . . . spheres] Mowat & Werstine (ed. 1992): “In Ptolemaic astronomy, each planet (star) was carried around the earth in a crystalline sphere.”
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2: standard
702 spheres] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “sockets. Eyes are seen as being enclosed in their sockets as stars were thought to be enclosed in their spheres or orbits.”
702