HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 629 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
629 That I will speake to thee, Ile call thee Hamlet,1.4.44
1761 SJC
Anon from HB, John Hazel Smith HB Supplement 13 (1978)
629-30 Anon. (St. James’s Chron., Oct. 1761.), rpt. in The Yearly Chronicle for M, Dcc, LXI. Or, A Collection of . . . Essays, Letters, &c. . . . in the St. James’s Chronicle for that Year. London, 1762. p. 312. <p. 312> apud Pye: “‘This seems to be a strange climax (if not an anticlimax.) But a slight alteration in </p.312> <p.313> the pointing will remove all objections, preserve the beauty of the climax, and perhaps give an additional force to the whole passage. I’ll call thee Hamlet King, Father,—Royal Dane O answer me! The young prince, being impatient to know why the ghost appeared, first addresses him by his particular name Hamlet, then by his title of King, and lastly by the endearing appellation of Father, with which the climax naturally and beautifully ends. He then proceeds to address the ghost by the general appellation, Royal Dane, O answer me.’”
1789 Anon.
Anon.
629-30 Ile . . . mee,] Anon. (1789, pp. 12-13): <p. 12> “When [Kemble] arrives at that part where he declares, ‘I will speak to thee; I’ll call thee Hamlet, </p. 12><p. 13> King, father, royal Dane—Oh, answer me,’ &c. his gradual recovery from a state of the most uncommon amasement and terror to a more calm and composed turn of mind, plainly denotes the command he must necessarily have over the passions. . . .” </p. 13>
1805 Seymour
Seymour: contra Anon. 1761 without attribution via theater
629-30 Seymour (1805, 2:156-7): <p. 156>“This address we have lately heard, at one of the great theatres, uttered thus: ‘—I’ll call then Hamlet! King! father!—Royal Dane, O answer me.’
</p. 156><p. 157>“Absurd! Hamlet know not by what gracious or acceptable title to salute the spectre; and here he is at once made to be familiar with him.—‘Royal Dane, O answer me’—no. ‘Dane is used, with emphatic dignity, as, in the first scene, the king says, ‘You cannot speak of reason to the Dane, And lose your voice.’
“Royal Dane! is the height of the vocative climax:” </p. 157>
He ends this note with a colon. Probably an error. It seems from Seymour’s note that actors agreed with Anon., perhaps were even influenced by him.
1807 Pye
Pye : Anon. in SJC
629-30 Ile . . . mee,] Pye (1807, pp. 312-13): <p. 312> “I’ll call thee Hamlet, King, Father, Royal Dane: O answer me. It is thus pointed in all the editions I have ever seen of the play, but there is something so convincing to me in the change of punctuation proposed in the following anonymous observation, published in the St. James’ Chronicle, Oct. 15, 1761, that I shall, without hesitation, adopt it. ‘This seems to be a strange climax (if not an anticlimax.) But a slight alteration in </p.312> <p.313> the pointing will remove all objections, preserve the beauty of the climax, and perhaps give an additional force to the whole passage. I’ll call thee Hamlet King, Father,—Royal Dane O answer me! The young prince, being impatient to know why the ghost appeared, first addresses him by his particular name Hamlet, then by his title of King, and lastly by the endearing appellation of Father, with which the climax naturally and beautifully ends. He then proceeds to address the ghost by the general appellation, Royal Dane, O answer me.’ This seems the criticism of a no mean critic. It must be remembered that the St. James’ Chronicle, when it first came out, received the assistance of Lloyd, Thornton, and Colman.”
Ed. note: The relevant issue of SJC is not extant.
1839 knt1
knt1: Suppl. note
629-30 Ile . . . mee,] Knight (ed. 1839, 1:170): “The vision, which, even when his incredulity has passed away, seems to Horatio only a ‘thing majestical’ is to Hamlet, ‘king, father, royal Dane.’ From the first word of Horatio’s narrative to this moment of the real presence of the apparition, Hamlet has no doubts. The excited state of his mind had prepared him to welcome the belief that ‘there are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in our philosophy.”
1877 v1877
v1877: Pye (including Anon, SJC), +
629-30 Hamlet , . . . mee,] Furness (ed. 1877): “Mr. Edwin Booth has informed me that his father always spoke the line thus [with a change in tone after father], and that he himself has always so spoken it. I believe Mr. Irving has also adopted it. To me it is unquestionably the true reading, and I have not hesitated to punctuate the text accordingly. Ed.
1885 macd
macd
629 Ile call thee] MacDonald (ed. 1885): “‘I’ll call thee’—for the nonce.”
1929 trav
trav contra SJC
629-30 Hamlet . . . royall Dane] Travers (ed. 1929), referring to SJC 1761, argues that even if an ascending order is intended, Royal Dane, meaning kingly king, will serve as a climax.
1939 kit2
kit2: anti climax
629-30 Ile call . . . royall Dane] Kittredge (ed. 1939): "There is no climax in these words. Hamlet the scholar knows that a supernatural being should be called upon by all known names that may belong to it. The theory was that the right name would force or induce it to speak. The same idea is the basis for all such invocations as that which begin the third book of Paradise Lost: ’Hail, holy Light,’ etc.."
1982 ard2
ard2:
629 Ile . . . Hamlet] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “Notwithstanding the uncertainty about the Ghost’s nature (625, 444), Hamlet now chooses to suppose it his father’s spirit. Confirmation will come when the Ghost asserts its identity (694), which Hamlet unquestioningly accepts (cf. 831); and though he will later wonder if it may not after all be a deceiving devil (1639-43), his play will finally convince him (2158-9).”
625 629 694 1639 2158