HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 536 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
536 But not exprest in fancy; rich not gaudy,1.3.71
1784 Davies
Davies
536 not exprest in fancy] Davies (1784, 3:14): “That is, not fantastic, tawdry, or foppish.”
1832 cald2
cald2
536 rich not gaudy] caldecott (ed. 1832): “[Greek]” Isocrates advising Demonicus.”
1870 rug1
rug1
536 Moberly (ed. 1870): “Not marked or singular in device; but with a quiet costliness suggestive of habitual self-respect.”
1873 rug2
rug2 = rug1
536
1877 v1877
v1877 = rug2
536
1878 rlf1
rlf1≈ rug2 minus 2nd clause +
536 exprest in fancy] Rolfe (ed. 1878): “or, in modern slang, loud.”
1885 mull
mull rug2 without attribution
536 not exprest in fancy] Mull (ed. 1885): “not singular.”
1929 trav
trav: standard +
536 not exprest in fancy] Travers (ed. 1929): “let it be ‘quiet,’ so that only the most “select’ shall appreciate the taste of it and divine the ‘cost.’”
1939 kit2
kit2: standard
536 exprest in fancy] Kittredge (ed. 1939): "showing its costliness by anything fantastic about it. The next phrase repeats the idea."
1950 Tilley
Tilley
536 Tilley (1950, C 541): “Comely not gaudy 1615 Welde Janua Ling. 179, p. 12: Let thy attire be comely, not gorgeous.”
Ed. note: None in Tilley before Sh.
1980 pen2
pen2
536 exprest in fancy] Spencer (ed. 1980): “designed in some peculiar and fanciful way.”
1982 ard2
ard2:
536 fancy] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “fantasticalness, ornamentation.”
1987 oxf4
oxf4
536 exprest in fancy] Hibbard (ed. 1987): "taking the form of fantasticalness. Polonius here takes up a stock complaint of Elizabethan satirists and critics of society. William Harrison, for example, writes: ‘The fantastical folly of our nation . . . is such that no form of apparel liketh us longer than the first garment is in the wearing, if it continue so long, and be not laid aside to receive some other trinket newly devised by the fickle-headed tailors, who covet to have several tricks in cutting, thereby to draw fond customers to more expense of money’ (quoted from Life in Shakespeare’s England, compiled by J. Dover Wilson (Harmondsworth, 1944), p. 129)."
1988 bev2
bev2: standard
536 fancy] Bevington (ed. 1988): “excessive ornament, decadent fashion.”
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2: standard
536 fancy] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “frivolous fashion”

ard3q2: standard gloss; performance; xref
536 rich not gaudy] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “expensive but not ostentatious. Sometimes in performance Polonius draws a contrast between his own garments and those of Laertes, but this makes nonsense of the context in which Laertes is dressed for sea travel, presumably wearing a sea-gown of the kind Hamlet refers to at [3513] and may himself be wearing in 5.1 (see [3452-3 CN]).”
536