HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 456 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
456 My fathers spirit (in armes) all is not well,1.2.254
444 456 624
1785 v1785
v1785
456 (in armes)] Whalley (apud ed. 1785) says, “I once hinted to Mr. Garrick, that these words might be spoken in this manner: ‘My father’s spirit! in arms! all is not well.—’”
Steevens doesn’t mention this idea in v1773 or v1778. 1st appears in v1785, MAL, v1793. Whalley’s comment may have appeared elsewhere, but I did not see it from a scan of Whalley’s Enquiry into the Learning of Sh.
1787 ann
ann = v1785
456 (in armes)]
1790 mal
mal = v1785
456 (in armes)]
1793 v1793
v1793 = mal
456 (in armes)]
1803 v1803
v1803 = v1793
456 (in armes)]
1805 Seymour
Seymour: Whalley
456 (in armes)] Seymour (1805, 2:152): “The prodigy was his father’s spirit ‘in arms,’ was a circumstance, but a circumstance so important, as fully to justify Mr. Whalley’s reading: ‘My father’s spirit! in arms!’”
1813 v1813
v1813 = v1803
456 (in armes)]
1821 v1821
v1821 = v1813
456 (in armes)]
1859 Werder
Werder
456-9 Werder (1859, trans. 1907, p. 80) believes that news of the apparition moves Hamlet from dim foreboding to “sudden illumination”: once his father speaks [694-776], Hamlet learns that “his presentiment was true; with one stroke it is all clear to him; he sees the entire relation of the different events.”
1866 Cartwright
Cartwright
456-7 Cartwright (1866, p. 36): “ . . . does not the line [226] ‘I have that within which passeth show,’ denote there is a something dwelling on his mind; this undefined, this phantom something becomes more tangible, ‘My father’s spirit in arms! all is not well; I doubt some foul play” [456-7]; and it bursts forth in ‘Oh, my prophetic soul, my uncle!” he had long suspected it.”
I placed Cartwright’s note in part in 266 and in728. Most of it goes in the Hamlet doc.
1874 Corson
Corson: F1; cam1
456 (in armes)] Corson (1874, p. 11): “Here the [F1] ? is again better than the ! ‘Arms’ should be uttered with a strong interrogative intonation.”
1885 macd
macd
456 My fathers spirit] MacDonald (ed. 1885): “Alone, he does not dispute the idea of its being his father.”
1891 dtn1
dtn1macd without attribution
456 My fathers spirit] Deighton (ed. 1891, p. x): “Convinced by their description that the Ghost must be that of his father, Hamlet arranges to watch with them the next night in order to discover the meaning of the mystery.”
1935 Wilson
Wilson WHH
456 (in armes): Wilson (1935, p.71) imagines that the realistic armor sanctions Hamlet’s belief.
1982 ard2
ard2:
456 My fathers spirit] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “Contrast 444. That ghosts were sprits of the departed was the traditional view from classical times and reinforced by the Catholic doctrine of purgatory. That protestants disputed it and denounced it as ’a foolish opinion’ (Burton, 1.2.1(2)) is not dramatically relevant. Shakespeare is aware of various beliefs and allows Hamlet to be the same. Cf. West, ’King Hamlet’s Ambiguous Ghost’, PMLA, 60, 1107 ff., and [CNs on the ghost].”
1987 Mercer
Mercer
456-9 Mercer (1987, p. 156): Hamlet can expect that this ghost “will know something, demand something; at all events there will be something to be done . . . . Suddenly he is no longer the doleful mourner, nor the brooding melancholic, nor the witty student, nor whatever he really is under these manifold identities.” Hamlet welcomes the news the ghost will bring even if it is about foul play.