HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 206 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
206 Thus much the busines is, we haue heere writ1.2.27
1726 theon
theon
206-12 We . . . subiect,] Theobald (1726, p. 6): “That is, We have writ to the Old King to stop his Nephew’s Expedition, because his Army is compos’d all out of the old King’s Subjects. But this Passage is so pointed, that, by the Reasoning being disjoined from the Sentence of which it ought to be a Part, the Sense is so much weaken’d, that it is almost lost. Restore it therefore, as some of the Editions lead the Way; ‘—We have here write To Norway, Uncle of young Fortinbras, Who, impotent and bed-rid, scarcely hears Of this his Nephew’s Purpose, to suppress His further Gate herein; in that the Levies, The Lists, and full Proportions, are all made Out of his Subjects:
1733 theo1
theo1theon
206-12 We . . . subiect,]
Ed.note: See also notes in 210, 212. The punc. is slightly different in theo1 from that in theon: parentheses from Who to Purpose and no comma after Proportions.
1768 cap
cap
206 heere writ] Capell (ed. 1768) uses the symbol † to indicate that the actor shows a stage property, perhaps a letter.
1870 Abbott
Abbott § 343
206 writ] Abbott (§ 343): “Owing to the tendency to drop the inflection en, the Elizabethan authors frequently used the curtailed form of past participles which are common in Early English: “I have spoke, forgot, writ, chid.’ &c, ”
1872 cln1
cln1
206 writ] Clark & Wright (ed. 1872): “Used by Shakespeare both as a preterite and participle.”
1878 rlf1
rlf1: Abbott § 343 +
206 writ] Rolfe (ed. 1878): “For the past tense S. uses writ oftener than wrote; for the participle he has usually writ or written, sometimes wrote.
1987 oxf4
oxf4
206 Thus . . . is] Hibbard (ed. 1987): "Taking Claudius at his word, Q1 begins the scene at this point."
206 207 208 209 210 211 212