HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 83 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
83 Hora. In what perticular {thought, to worke} <thought to work,> I know not,1.1.67
1747- mwarb
mwarb
83 perticular . . . work] Warburton (1747-) “What to think of it particularly.”
1773 v1773
v1773 ≈ mwarb without attribution
83 perticular . . . work] Steevens (ed. 1773): “What particular train of thinking to follow. Steevens.
1778 v1778
v1778= v1773
83 perticular . . . work]
1784 ays1
ays1 = v1778
83 perticular . . . work]
1785 v1785
v1785 = v1778
83 perticular . . . work]
1787 ann
ann = v1785
83 perticular . . . work]
1790 mal
mal = v1785
83 perticular . . . work]
1791- rann
rann ≈ v1785 + in magenta underlined
83-5 rann (ed. 1791-): “I am at a loss what train of thinking to pursue; but, according to my simple apprehension, this appearance forebodes some state malady on the point of breaking out.”
1793 v1793
v1793 = v1790
83 perticular . . . work]
1803 v1803
v1803 = v1793
83 perticular . . . work]
1805 Seymour
Seymour ≈ rann without attribution + in magenta underlined
83-5 Seymour (1805, 2:139-40): <p. 139> “I know not how to adjust my thoughts, or form a systematic conclusion as to this wonderful event, but the preponderating influence of it, on </p. 139><p. 140> my mind, is, that it is the awful foreboder of some dreadful calamity.—This is sense and nature; yet I once saw a most eloquent and able man decried and hooted by a senatorial rabble, for an alleged inconsistency, in his having said, upon a deep and complicated question, that he, decidedly, condemned the principle, though he was not prepared, at the exigence of the moment, to enter into the detail.” </p. 140>
The new portion of this note seems irrelevant to me. I would opt for dissing it.
1813 v1813
v1813 = v1803
83 perticular . . . work]
1819 cald1
cald1
83 perticular . . . work] Caldecott (ed. 1819): “In what particular course to set my thoughts to work: in what particular train to direct the mind and exercise it in conjecture.”
1821 v1821
v1821 =v1813
83 perticular . . . work]
1832 cald2
cald1 = cald2
83 perticular . . . work]
1854 del2
del2
83-4 Delius (ed. 1854): “Dem particular thought, der besonderen Richtung, die die Dedanken zu nehmen haben, wird hier das gross and scope, der allgemeine Spielraum, in dem (such Mermuthung) bewegt, entgegengestellt.” [To the particular thought, the particular direction that thoughts may take, is opposed the gross and scope of the area in which imagination moves.]
1872 cln1
cln1: standard
83-4 Clark & Wright (ed. 1872): “I know not what special line of thought to follow, but in the general tendency of my views, &c.”
1877 v1877
v1877 = v1813
83 perticular . . . work]
1891 dtn1
dtn1 standard paraphrase
83-5 Deighton (ed. 1891): “though of many lines of thought I do not know which one would, if explored, show the particular danger threatened, the general drift of my opinion is to foreshadow some strange outbreak which shall shake our state.”
1903 rlf3
rlf3: gloss ≈ cln1 without attribution
83-4 Rolfe (ed. 1903): “I know not what particular line of thought to follow, but in a general way my opinion is, etc.”
1913 tut2
tut2rlf3 without attribution
83-4 Goggin (ed. 1913): “‘I cannot form any precise opinion, but on the whole I am inclined to think, etc.’”
1938 parc
parc = Greg
83 thought,] Parrott & Craig (ed. 1938) explain the comma as a printer’s error. Greg, in “An Elizabethan Printer and His Copy,’ Library, [4:115]. points our a case where a usually careful Elizabethan printer inserted a comma where none appeared in the ms. or was wanted by the sense. A similar superfluous comma appears after marte, [90].”
1987 Mercer
Mercer
83-5 Mercer (1987, p.128): “We are [with these lines] in a world of argument and reason, of deduction and interpretation . . . What is certain is that Horatio does not suspect, any more than the two officers do, that this may be a ghost seeking revenge: almost any explanation seems more plausible than that.”

Mercer
83-5 Mercer (1987, p. 137): “. . . What we see emerging from the [first scene’s] uncertainty is . . . the Ghost of Hamlet’s father crying for revenge. As Nicholas Brooke rightly asserts, in this first scene, ’the authority of the ghost is decisively settled (for the audience) and nevermore to be shaken; so is its ominousness’ (Shakespeare’s Early Tragedies (London, 1968) pp. 173-4).”
[p. 262, n. 4] “Roland Mushat Frye, in The Renaissance Hamlet (Princeton, NJ, 1984) argues that dubiety about the Ghost is crucial to Hamlet’s dilemma and would have been of greater importance to Shakespeare’s audience than it may be to us.” Ed. note: See play as whole.
1992 fol2
fol2: standard
83-4 In what . . . opinion] Mowat & Werstine (ed. 1992): “i.e., I cannot be precise, but in my general opinion“
83