HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 63 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
63 Mar. It is offended.1.1.50
59 62 63 65
1859 Rohrbach
Rohrbach
63 offended] Rohrbach (apud Prosser, 1971, p, 98) began the tradition of assuming that the spirit is offended at the word usurpst [59].
Ed. note: original not located
1883 macd
macd ≈ Rohrbach without attribution
63 offended] MacDonald (ed. 1883): “—at the word usurp’st.”
1971 Prosser
Prosser
63-6 Prosser (1971, p. 98) asserts that if the ghost had been offended at the word usurpst [59] it would have exited at that point; the ghost is offended at the words by heauen [62] because it is an evil spirit.
1982 ard2
ard2 contra Prosser
63 Jenkins (ed. 1982) asserts that the ghost is offended becuse “the interlocutor is not the one it seeks.”
Ed. note: Jenkins’s opinion contradicts 57; it had wished to be spoken to by those present; nor does it explain the ghost’s return to the same place.
1993 dent
dent
63 Andrews (ed. 1993) says that Marcellus assumes that the ghost is offended at the reference to heaven.
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2
63 offended] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “Perhaps the Ghost is offended by Horatio’s usurp’st, by his over-importunate use of charge (should a subject command a king?), or, as at [137-45], by an apparent threat of violence.”