HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 42 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
42 That are so fortified against our story,1.1.32
42 43
1854 del2
del2
42-3 our story, What] Delius (ed. 1854): “d.h. in Sh.’s Construction our story of what etc. ‘Die Geschichte von dem, was wir zwei Nächte sahen.’” [This means in Sh.’s construction our story of what etc ‘The story of what we have seen two nights.’]
1872 cln1
cln1
42-3 our story, What] Clark & Wright (ed. 1872): “A comma is usually placed after ‘story,’ and the construction is as if ‘let me tell you’ had been used instead of ‘let us assail your ears.’ It is an instance of what the Greek grammarians called [Greek]. But we may omit the comma, and take ‘what . . . seen’ as an epexegesis of ‘story’.”
1877 v1877
v1877 = cln1
42-3 our story, What]
1880 meik
meikdel2 without attribution; ≈ Abbott § 252 in blue (see n. 43)
42-3 our story, What] Meikeljohn (ed. 1880): “Or the pointing ‘Our story—what we have two nights seen’ (the what we being an expansion or explanation of our story), might give the sense better.”
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2
42 fortified] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “Horatio is incredulous.”