HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 3112, etc. - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2951-end ed. Hardin A. Aasand
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
3112+6 {We should doe when we would: for this would changes,} 3112+64.7.119
1805 Chedworth
Chedworth
3112+6 We . . . changes] Seymour (1805, 2:197) :<p. 197> “i.e. What we are desirous to do we should do at once, as inclination is fluctuating and uncertain. Perhaps the expression would be better by a slight change: ‘—That we should do.’ i.e. What we ought to do; we should do when we would, i.e. while inclination serves, for, &c.”</p. 197>
[Ed: Should we give Chedworth or Seymour credit for this? Caldecott gives them to Seymour]
1819 cald1
cald1≈v1813 (minus Holt White); Cald1≈Seymour magenta underlined
3112+6 We should do when we would ] Caldecott (ed. 1819):“ i.e. at the heat, at the time of the resolution taken.”
Cald1≈Seymour (or Chedworth?)
3112+6 for this would changes] Seymour (apud Caldecott, ed. 1819): “Inclination is fluctuating and uncertain. SEYMOUR”
1869 tsch
tsch
3112+5-+6 that . . . would] Tschischwitz (ed. 1869): “Auf dem Satze: That we would do, we should do, when we would; beruht der eigentliche Grundgedanke des Drama’s.” [“The specific, fundamental thought of the play depends on the sentence: That we . . . would.”]
1870 rug1
rug1
3112+6 this would changes] Moberly (ed. 1870): “Our will to the enterprise is apt to abate of itself from a hundred causes. Then there remains the ‘should,’ the duty, neglected and undone; and he who vainly acknowledges that he ‘should’ have done a thing is like a spendthrift sighing for his squandered estate.”
1873 rug2
rug2=rug1
3112+6 this would changes] Moberly (ed. 1873): “Our will to the enterprise is apt to abate of itself from a hundred causes. Then there remains the ‘should,’ the duty, neglected and undone; and he who vainly acknowledges that he ‘should’ have done a thing is like a spendthrift sighing for his squandered estate.”
1877 v1877
v1877 : tsch
3112+5-+8 that . . . accedents] Tschiwschwitz (apud Furness, ed. 1877): “The fundamental idea of the whole tragedy. Grant White (Hamlet the Younger, Galaxy, April, 1870, p. 544) says the same.”
v1877 :
3112+6 should . . . would] Furness (ed. 1877): “See 1.5.32 [0000]; 3.3.73 [0000]; [Mac. 1.5.19 (0000) and 3.6.19 (0000).”
[1879] Bullock
Bullock
3112+5-+10 that . . . easing] Bullock ([1879], p. 46): Bullock lists this section under precept 31, “Improvement of Present Time.”
1885 Leo
Leo
3112+5-+10 that . . . easing] Leo (1885, pp. 93-4): <p. 93>“These words contain the fullest solution of the King’s character as well as of that of Hamlet. How is it possible, reading these lines, to believe that Shakespeare intended to give to the portrait of Hamlet any touch of energy!
“I feel induced here to repeat what I remarked in reviewing (in the Shakespeare Jahrbuch) Mr. Halliwell Phillipps’ Memoranda on the Tragedy of Hamlet: ‘Each period has its individual stamp for every manifestation of intellectual life. The romantic </p. 93> <p. 94>period produces ideal philosophers, while in the time of materialism the realistic philsophers are in season. They are never more than the results and consequences, the reflections of the genius of the age, and while they at the best are nothing but the shade of it, they believe to be its light, nay, even itself! It is the like with the so-called æsthetic criticism. In the romantic period it was able to discover in Hamlet the soul that breaks down under the burden it is charged with; the philosophical dreamer, whose imaginative sphere of thought assumes for him the character of a substantial fact, while the real substantiality of things and actions flutters away before his mind as a mere nothing.” </p. 94>
1885 macd
macd
3112+6 MacDonald (ed. 1885): “The sense here requires an s, and the space in the Quarto between the e and the comma gives the probability that a letter has dropt out.”
I’ve examined both the Yale and the Huntington Q2 and can find no instance of an “s” being dropped in either text. Does MacDonald have a real press variant here, or can’t he see the “s” in the one he has? He records in his Q2 reading at the footnote level that the word is “change ,” Strange!
1934a cam3
cam3
3112+5-+10 that . . . easing] Wilson (ed. 1934): “As many have noted, these words point the whole moral of Hamlet, and are a comment (unconscious on Claud.’s part, but intentional on Sh.’s) upon Ham.’s character, as indeed much of the action in Act 4 is likewise. Cf. Introd. p. lxi.”
1939 kit2
kit2
3112+6 this would] Kittredge (ed. 1939): “our will to act.”
1947 cln2
cln2 ≈ standard
3112+5-3112+10 Rylands (ed. 1947): “i.e. we ought to put our intentions into action at once.”
cln2 ≈ cam3
3112+5-+10 that . . . easing] Wilson (ed. 1934): “As many have noted, these words point the whole moral of Hamlet, and are a comment (unconscious on Claud.’s part, but intentional on Sh.’s) upon Ham.’s character, as indeed much of the action in Act 4 is likewise. Cf. Introd. p. lxi.
1982 ard2
ard2
3112+6 Jenkins (ed. 1982): “While the will still exists, we ought to act on it.”
1987 oxf4
oxf4 : Tilley
3112+5-+8 that . . . accedents] Hibbard (ed. 1987, Appendix A, p. 366): <p. 366> “See Tilley N54, ‘He that will not when he may, when he would he shall have nay.’” </p. 366>
3112+6