HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 2970 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2951-end ed. Hardin A. Aasand
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
2970 And where th’offence is, let the great axe fall. 4.5.219
1734 theol
theol
2970 axe] Warburton (2 June 1734 [fol. 141r] [Nichols 2:644]): <fol. 141r>“TAX i.e. penalty,—punishment.” </fol. 141r>“
1747 warb
warb : theol
2970 axe] Warburton (ed. 1747) : “let the great TAX fall. i.e. penalty, punishment.”
1765 heath
heath : warb
2970 axe] Heath (1765, p.545) : <p. 545> "This alteration of the text, whereby, ’the great tax,’ is substituted in the place of the common reading, ’the greatax,’ doth not appear to be necessary; but, if it were admitted, I should still differ from Mr. Warburton in his interpretation of it. He says it means, ’penalty, punishment;’ I apprehend it would signify here, imputation with all its consequences." </p. 545>
1765 john1
john1 : warb + magenta underlined
2970 axe] Johnson (ed. 1765) : “‘Fall’ corresponds better to ax.”
1773 v1773
v1773 = john1 (minus WARB)
2970 axe]
1773 jen
jen =warb
2970 axe]
1785 v1785
v1785 = john1
2970 axe]
1819 cald1
cald1
2970 axe] Caldecott (ed. 1819) : “i.e. the axe ‘that is to be laid to the root.’ ‘—The two-handed engine , Ready to strike once and strike no more.’ Lycid. 131”
1832 cald2
cald2 = cald1
2970 axe]
1857 elze1
elze1: warb
2970 axe] elze (ed. 1857): "Unter ’great axe’ is offenbar das Henkerbeil zu verstehen. Warburton hat verballhornt: the great tax." ["Under ’the great axe’ is clearly understood to be the executioner’s axe. Warburton has bowlderized it to ’the great tax.’"
1877 neil
neil
2970 axe] Neil (ed. 1877, Notes): “Matt. 3:10; Luke 3:9.”
1877 v1877
v1877 = WARB
2970 axe
1882 elze2
elze2
2970 the great axe] Elze (ed. 1882): “i.e. the executioner’s axe. Compare §218 [3524]: not to stay the grinding of the Axe.”
1885 macd
macd
2971 MacDonald (ed. 1885): “Note such a half line frequently after the not uncommon closing couplet—as if to take off the formality of the couplet, and lead back, through the more speech-like, to greater verisimilitude.”
1909 subb
subb ≈ standard
2970 axe
1939 kit2
kit2 ≈ cald without attribution
2970 axe
1980 pen2
pen2
2970 Spencer (ed. 1980): “The Queen can hardly fail to hear this threat to Hamlet. But Claudius is doubtless thinking of his secret instructions to the King of England not to stay the grinding of the axe but Hamlet’s head should be struck off (5.2.24-5 [3524-25). He comes to terms with Laertes for his own saftey. Not until IV.7.43 [3045ff] does the news come that Hamlet, contrary to expectations, is returning to Elsinore; and then Claudius sees the advantages of allaying himself with Laertes against Hamlet.”
1993 dent
dent ≈ pen2
2970
2970