HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 2795 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2023-2950 ed. Frank N. Clary
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
2795 Oph. Indeede <la?> without an oath Ile make an end on’t, 27954.5.57
1854 del2
del2
2795 la] Delius (ed. 1854): “ la, eine Interjection, = lo sieh! [la is an interjection meaning lo, look!]”
1860 Walker
Walker
2795 Indeede] Walker (1860, 3:269): “‘Indeed la, without an oath,’ &c. So in the folio, rightly, I think.”
1882 elze2
elze2: malsii, Dekker, Wilbraham
2795 Indeede] Elze (ed. 1882): “Indeed la] Indeed la and truly la were favourite protestations with the Puritans and served them instead of oaths. Compare The Puritan, 1.4; 2.1; 3.1 (Malone’s Supplement, II, 554, 564, and 573). Ib., V, 4 (Malone’s Supplement, II, 624): Where is truely la, indeed la, he that will not swear, but lie; he that willnot steal, but rob; pure Nicholas Saint-Antilings? I cannot bring myself to the belief that this la should be indentical with lo = behold, but suspect that there are two different la’s, the one of which I take to be a corruption from Lord (lor, law, lah, la). Compare Dekker, the Honest Whore, Part I, I, 3 (Middleton, ed. Dyce, III, 19) La, you now. According to Wilbraham, Glossary of Words used in Cheshire (London, 1836), s. v. Laws you now, this exclamation means: See you now, and is used as Lo. It may, however, be submitted, that it rather seems to be an abbreviation or corruption of Lord help you now or Lord bless you now, in a similar way as Lawcus Heart is a corruption of Lord Christ’s Heart, (Original Glossaries, ed. W. W. Skeat, No. III). That indeed as well as la was considered as a mild oath, is shown by the following passage in Dekker’s Honest Whore (Middleton, ed. Dyce, III, 48):—‘Bel[lafront]. Indeed, not any. Hip[polito]. indeed, and blush not? Bel. No, in truth, not any. Hip. Indeed? in truth? -- how warily you swear! ‘Tis well, if ill it be not; yet had I The ruffian in me, and were drawn before you But in light colours, I do know indeed,You could not swear indeed, but thunder oaths That should shake heaven, drown the harmonious spheres, ‘And pierce a soul that lov’d her maker’s honour With horror and amazement.’”
1885 macd
macd
2795 MacDonald (ed. 1885): “—disclaiming false modesty.”
1890 irv2
irv2 ≈ elze
2795 Indeed la] Symons (Irving & Marshall, ed. 1890): “Elze (p. 213) notes that ‘Indeed la and truly la were favourite protestations with the Puritans, and served them instead of oaths. Compare the Puritan, 1.4; 2.1; 3.1 (Malone’s Supplement, ii. 554, 564, and 573). iv, v. 4 (Malone’s Supplement, ii. 624: ‘Where is truly la, indeed la, he that will not swear, but lie; he that will not steal, but rob; pure Nicholas Saint-Antlings?’”
1929 trav
trav: The Puritan analogue
2795 without . . . oath] Travers (ed. 1929): “Else quotes from another play, The Puritan, publ. 1607, ‘Where is Truly La, Indeed La, he that will not swear?’”
1980 pen2
pen2
2795 la] Spencer (ed. 1980): “(a very mild substitute for an oath).”
pen2
2795 make . . . on’t] Spencer (ed. 1980): “finish the song (in spite of its immodesty).”
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2: 2796, 2799 xref
2795 without an oath] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “Ophelia may be conscious of avoiding saying ’Jesus’ in [2796] and ’God’ in [2799].”
2795