HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 2743+35 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2023-2950 ed. Frank N. Clary
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
2743+35 {Of thinking too precisely on th’euent,} 2743+354.4.42
1723- mtby2
mtby2
2743+35 Of] Thirlby (1723-): “Or, v.v.8, 9 [4.4.49-53 (2743+43 - 2743+47)].”
1733- mtby3
mtby3 = mtby3
Now “Or” for “Of” marked “f” for strong conj. Cross-ref is repeated here, with line numbers adjusted, but point is no clearer.
1819 cald1
cald1
2743+35 th’euent] Caldecott (ed. 1819): “Consequences.”
1869 tsch
tsch: Lucian (Thucidides, Pliny)
2743+35-36 Of . . . thought] Tschischwitz (ed. 1869): “Der Gedanke, dass höhere Geistesbildung eine bis nahe an Feigheit grenzende Neigung zum Zögern zur nothwendigen Folge habe, war bereits dem Alterthum geläufig. Wenigstens behauptet Lucian in seiner Zuschrift an den Philosophen Nigrinus: [gr.], wobei er sich auf einen Ausspruch des Thucydides (II, 400) stützt, den Plin. Epist. lib. IV. 7. genauer anführt: [gr.], was Solanus wiedergiebt mit Imperitia audaces, segniores ad agendum ratio facit, während Bourdelotius gradezu übersetzt: Imperitia confidentiam, eruditio timorem creat. Die Hamlettragödie ist eine eminent glückliche Lösung dieses uralten Erfahrungssatzes.” [The idea that higher education had as a necessary consequence a tendency to hesitate that bordered on cowardice was already current in ancient times. At least Lucian observed in his dedication to the philosopher Nigrinus; [Greek words], which he based on a statement of Thucydides (II, 400), which Plin. Epist. lib. 4.7 included more accurately, and Solanus repeats with Imperitia audaces, segniores ad agendum ratio facit, while Bourdelotius immediately translates: Imperitia confidentiam, eruditio timorem creat. The Hamlet tragedy is an eminently successful representation of this ancient empirical principle.]
1870 rug1
rug1
2743+35 thinking . . . th’euent] Moberly (ed. 1870): “See Introduction. This passage also is constantly omitted on the stage, to the great detriment of the play. Hamlet envies everyone who has quick and determined resolution, and whose energy does not, like his own, evaporate in meditation, and pass by opportunity after opportunity for action.”
1878 rlf1
rlf1: xref.
2743+35 euent] Rolfe (ed. 1878): “= issue; as in [4.4.50 (2743+44)] below.”
1891 dtn
dtn
2743+35 Of thinking] Deighton (ed. 1891): “which consists in thinking.”
dtn
2743+35 precisely] Deighton (ed. 1891): “minutely.”
1899 ard1
ard1 ≈ rlf1
2743+35 th’euent] Dowden (ed. 1899): “issue, consequences, as line [4.4.50 (2743+44)].”
1903 rlf3
rlf3 = rlf1 minus Abbott, rug for Of
1907 Werder
Werder
2743+35–2743+38 Werder (1907; rpt. 1977, pp. 155-6): <p.155> “This means that Hamlet is revolting at his task, but not at himself, not at that which he is to do, but rather what he must suffer by it, not at what he makes out of it, but rather what it makes out of him. His imperative destiny speaks, not his own misfortune, with his voice, because he is its victim, and therefore his </p.155> <p.156> bitterness rings out against it as if against himself. ‘How all occasions do inform against me’—yes, indeed, ‘inform,’ for he is obliged to do what he cannot and yet must do if there is a God in heaven!” </p.156>
Werder
2743+35 Werder (1907; rpt. 1977, p.27 ): “It is of course quite probable that, when Hamlet was ‘thinking too precisely on the event,’ he was considering, among other things, the question how he could avenge his father without sacrificing his own life or freedom. And assuredly, also, he was anxious that his act of vengeance should not be misconstrued, and would never have been content to leave a ‘wounded name’ behind him. His dying words prove that.”
1931 crg1
crg1
2743+35 th’euent] Craig (ed. 1931): “outcome.”
1934 cam3
cam3 ≈ cald1
2743+35 event] Wilson (ed. 1934): “consequence.”
1939 kit2
kit2
2743+35 thinking . . . euent] Kittredge (ed. 1939): “considering too carefully what the outcome may be.”
1947 cln2
cln2
2743+35 euent ] Rylands (ed. 1947): “issue, consequence (Lat. eventus).”
1957 pel1
pel1 = crg1, ard1 (xref.)
2743+35 euent] Farnham (ed. 1957): “outcome (as also in [4.4.50 (2743+44)]).”
1974 evns1
evns1 = crg1
2743+35 euent] Evans (ed. 1974): “outcome.”
1980 pen2
pen2
2743+35-2743+37 thinking . . . coward] Spencer (ed. 1980): “Anxiety about the precise consequences of one’s actions is due to cowardice much more than to prudence (a remarkably unillisioned analysis by Hamlet of his own feelings and motives).”
pen2 = evns1 for euent
1982 ard2
ard2: Abbott
2743+35 Of] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “from, in consequence of. Abbott 168.”
ard2 ≈ trav (Florio’s Montaigne)
2743+35 thinking . . . wisdom] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “Cf. Florio’s Montaigne (1.23): ‘A wisdom so tenderly precise, and so precisely circumspect, is a mortal enemy to haughty executions’.”
ard2 ≈ pel1 (incl. xref.)
2743+35 event] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “outcome, consequence, as also in l2743+44.”
1984 chal
chal
2743+35 precisely] Wilkes (ed. 1984): “obsessively.”
chal = evns1 for euent
1988 bev2
bev2
2743+35 precisely] Bevington (ed. 1988): “scrupulously.”
bev2 = evns1 for euent
1997 evns2
evns2 = evns1
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2
2743+35 Of] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “caused by.”

ard3q2
2743+35 event] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “outcome.”

ard3q2
2743+35 precisely] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “rigorously, with attention to minute detail.”
2743+35