HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 2743+25 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2023-2950 ed. Frank N. Clary
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
2743+25 {Ham. Ile be with you straight, goe a little before.} 2743+254.4.32
1733- mtby3
mtby3
2743+25 Ile] Thirlby (1733-): “an I will.”
Labeled “an” for fairly strong conj.
1747-53 mtby4
mtby4 = mtby3
1867 ktlyn
ktlyn
2743+25 goe a little before] Keightley (1867, p. 295): “‘I’ll be with you straight. Go on a little before.’”
1870 Abbott
Abbott
2743+25 straight] Abbott (1870, §484): “since they naturally allow the voice to rest upon them, [monosyllables containing diphthongs and long vowels] are often so emphasized as to dispense with an unaccented syllable. When the monosyllables are imperatives, like ‘peace,’ the pause which they require after them renders them peculiarly liable to be thus emphasized. Whether the word is disyllabized, or merely requires a pause after it, cannot in all cases be determined. In the following examples the scansion is marked throughout on the former supposition, but it is not intended to be represented as necessary. ‘I’ll be / with (wi’) you strai / ght. Go / a little / before.’”
1870 Miles
Miles
2743+25-2743+60 Miles (1870, pp. 64-5): <p.64> “[Hamlet’s last soliloquy] may have been written to strengthen the Act, or to please Burbage or whoever played the part: written, tried, and abandoned. For though a leading tragedian might cling to so tempting a bit of declamation, the house, the company, and the author, would be sure to reject it in the end. It is most awkwardly introduced—lugged in by the head and heels like a dead afterthought. It is the one speech too many that palsies both actor and audience; that fails alike on the stage or in the </p.64><p.65> closet; that superficially countenances the imputation of weakness and needlessly complicates the character. . . . After the other noble monologues, it is weak as water. But the supreme reason for its rejection is that it is false . . . . He had not strength and means to do it, and could not have until rescued from captivity and impending death by that well-appointed pirate. So, apart from its being most lamely and discordantly introduced, ‘I’ll be with you straight—go a little before,’—there is a positive necessity for its rejection: it is False! False and unnatural. For however happily his counterplot may terminate, it is surely not as a prisoner on the brink of exile, environed by the royal guards, that such a motive for self-reproach would occur. . . . One thing however is clear: unless Hamlet planned the subsequent piratical capture, the Soliloquy is not only superfluous and contradictory, but absurd.” </p.65>
1885 macd
macd
2743+25 MacDonald (ed. 1885): “Note his freedom.”
1993 dent
dent
2743+25 before] Andrews (ed. 1993): “Ahead of me.”
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2: 2718 xref; WT //; Rowe
2743+25 Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “[stage direction:] There is no stage direction] in Q2, but most editors since Rowe take everyone except hamlet offstage here. T is perhaps surprising that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are prepared to leave Hamlet alone, after the king’s instruction to ’Follow him at foot’ (4.3.51 [2718]); it seems likely that they retire but observe from a distance. RP notes a similarity with WT 4.4.832-3 when Autolycus soliloquizes before following the others offstage.”

ard3q2
2743+25 straight] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “immediately.”
2743+25