HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 1931 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 1018-2022 ed. Eric Rasmussen
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
1931 Obserue my Vncle, if his occulted guilt3.2.80
-1845 mhun1
mhun1
1931-32 if...speech] Hunter (-1845, f.228v): “The speech which Hamlet himself had prepared for the Players— an additional proof—if one was wanting that the play about which he conversed with the players was that by which the King’s conscience was to be tried; & that consequently his soliloquizing on the subjectcould not be the first conception of the design.”
1845 hunter
hunter = mhun1
1931-32 if...speech] Hunter (1845, p. 247-48): <p. 247>“The speech which Hamlet himself had prepared for the players; an additional proof, if any were wanting, that the play of the Murder of Gonzago, about which he had conversed with the actors, was that which was to catch the conscience of the king, and, therefore, that the soliloquizing on </p. 247><p. 248>which I have remarked could not, as it appears in the play as it at present stands, be the origination of this design.”</p. 248>
1872 cln1
cln1
1931 occulted] Clark & Wright (ed. 1872): “concealed. The word seems to occur in this place only. “
1877 clns
clns
1931 occulted guilt] Neil (ed. 1877): “This is the correct law phrase. Murder was defined by the old legal writers as occulta hominis occisio, etc., ‘the secret slaying of a person’ — Coke’s Institutes, iii, cap. 7.
1931