HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 1696-7 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 1018-2022 ed. Eric Rasmussen
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
1696 That show of such an exercise may cullour 3.1.44
1697 Your {lowlines;} <lonelinesse.> we are oft too blame in this,
1733 theo1
theo1
1697 Theobald (ed. 1733) in AWW note for emendation from louliness to loneliness refers to Ham, 1697 where loneliness means being alone, (2.375 n.9).
1773 jen
jen
1697 lowlines] Jennens (ed. 1773): “The 1st and 2d qu’s read lowliness; so does S, without giving the reading of the 3d q. 1727, viz. loneliness, which must be the true reading, and is in all the other editions.”
1778 v1778
v1778
Steevens (ed. 1778): “Thus the folio. The first and second quartos read lowliness.”
1843 col1
col1
1697 Collier (ed. 1843): “Thus the folio. The quartos, 1604, &c. with evident corruption read, lovliness.
1858 col3
COL3=COL1+
1697 Collier (ed. 1858): “In ‘All’s Well that Ends Well’ [1.3.171. (498)], we have seen ‘loneliness’ misprinted loveliness--- even an easier mistake.”
1885 macd
macd
1697 MacDonald (ed. 1885): “—aside to the king. I insert these asides, and suggest the queen’s going up to Ophelia, to show how we may easily hold Ophelia ignorant of their plot. Poor creature as she was, I would believe Shakespere did not mean her to lie to Hamlet. This may be why he omitted that part of her father’s speech in the1st Q given in the note immediately above, telling her the king is going to hide. Still, it would be excuse enough for her, that she thought his madness justified the deception”
1899 ard1
1696 exercise] Dowden (ed. 1899): “act of devotion (the book being one of prayers), as in King Richard III. III. vii. 64: ‘his holy exercise.’”
1696 1697