HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 935 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
935 Hauing euer seene in the prenominat crimes 2.1.43
1778 v1778
v1778
935 prenominat crimes] Steevens (ed. 1778) defines: “i.e. crimes already named.”
1785 v1785
v1785 = v1778
935 prenominat crimes]
1787 ann
ann = v1785
935 prenominat crimes]
1790 mal
mal = v1785
935 prenominat crimes]
1793 v1793
v1793 = mal
935 prenominat crimes]
1803 v1803
v1803 = v1793
935 prenominat crimes]
1813 v1813
v1813 = v1803
935 prenominat crimes]
1821 v1821
v1821 = v1813
935 prenominat crimes]
1868 c&mc
c&mc ≈ Steevens without attribution
935 prenominat] Clarke and Clarke (ed. 1868): “‘The crimes I have just named.’”
1870 Abbott
Abbott § 342
935 prenominat] Abbott (§ 342): “Participle: -ed omitted after d and t. [. . .] on account of their already resembling participles in the their termination.” Euphony dictates the rule.
1872 hud2
hud2
935-6 Hauing . . . guiltie] Hudson (ed. 1872): “Having at any time seen the youth you speak of guilty in the forenamed vices.
1878 rlf1
rlf1 ≈ Steevens without attribution + // Tro. 4.5.250; Abbott § 342
935 prenominat] Rolfe (ed. 1878): “aforesaid.”
1881 hud3
hud3 = hud2
935-6
1885 mull
mull Steevens without attribution
935 prenominat] Mull (ed. 1885): “‘sullies.’”
1929 trav
trav
935 Travers (ed. 1929) discusses strict metrists like Abbott and which syllables might be elided, but holds that the whole passage is irregular, as he noted for 890-910.
1938 parc
parc: standard
935 premoninat] Parrott & Craig (ed. 1938): “before mentioned.”
1939 kit2
kit2: standard
935 Hauing euer seene] Kittredge (ed. 1939): "if he has ever seen."

kit2
935 crimes] Kittredge (ed. 1939): "faults. Very common in this general sense. Cf. [697 2357]."
Ed. note: Kittredge minimizes the extent of approbrium attached to the word ’crime.’
1947 cln2
cln2: standard
935 prenominat] Rylands (ed. 1947): "before mentioned."
1957 pel1
pel1: standard
935 Hauing euer] Farnham (ed. 1957): “if he has ever.”

pel1: standard
935 prenominat] Farnham (ed. 1957): “aforementioned.”
1970 pel2
pel2 = pel1
935 Hauing euer] Farnham (ed. 1970): “if he has ever”

pel2 = pel1
935 prenominat] Farnham (ed. 1970): “aforementioned”
1980 pen2
pen2: standard
935 Hauing] Spencer (ed. 1980): “if he has.”

pen2: standard
935 prenominat] Spencer (ed. 1980): “before-mentioned.”
1982 ard2
ard2: standard
935 prenominat] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “aforenamed.”

ard2: kit2 without attribution
935 crimes] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “The word was often used in a less restricted sense than now. Cf. 697.”
1985 cam4
cam4: standard
935 crimes] Edwards (ed. 1985): "faults. See note to [696]."
1987 oxf4
oxf4: // 2H4 4.4.39
935 compare 2H4 4.4.39 (2413)], ‘But, being moody, give him line and scope.’ "

oxf4 = Abbott § 377; standard gloss
935 prenominat crimes] Hibbard (ed. 1987): "aforesaid misdemeanours."
1988 bev2
bev2: standard
935 Hauing euer] Bevington (ed. 1988): “if he has ever.”

bev2: standard
935 prenominat crimes] Bevington (ed. 1988): “before-mentioned offences.”
1992 fol2
fol2: standard
935 prenominat crimes] Mowat & Werstine (ed. 1992): “before-named wrong-doings”
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2: standard
935-6 Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “Polonius’ word order is convoluted: ’in the prenominate crimes’ depends on ’guilty’.”

ard3q2: standard
935 Hauing euer] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “if he has ever”

ard3q2: standard
935 prenominat] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “aforementioned”
697 935 2357