HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 734 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
734 O Hamlet, what <a> falling off was there
1765 john
john
734 falling off] Johnson (ed. 1765, 6. 267n), in discussing Tim., fall 5.1.148 (2384): “Falling off in the quotation [from Ham.] is not disgrace but defection.
1880 Tanger
Tanger
734 falling off] Tanger (1880, p. 125): Q2’s om. of a “seems to be a simple accidental omission.”
1885 macd
macd
734-42 MacDonald (ed. 1885): “This passage, from ‘Oh Hamlet,’ most indubitably asserts the adultery of Gertrude.”
1980 pen2
pen2
734 falling off] Spencer (ed. 1980): “(both ’decline in moral standards’ and ’desertion’).”
1982 ard2
ard2: xref
734 what falling] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “Metre favours the article, which F supplies. But cf. Q2 What, F. What a at 1350.”
1987 oxf4
oxf4
734 falling off] Hibbard (ed. 1987): "(1) change for the worse (2) revolt form allegiance. Compare [1H4 1.3.93-4 (415-16)], ‘Revolted Mortimer! He never did fall off.’ "
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2: ard2: standard gloss; xref
734 what falling off] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “what a desertion or decline in standards. F’s ’what a falling’ improves both grammar and metre, but Jenkins, while printing ’what a falling’, compares Q2’s ’what a piece of work is man’ at [1350].”