HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 315 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
315 Or that the euerlasting had not fixt 1.2.131
315 316 655 656
1783 Ritson
Ritson
315-16 fixt His cannon] Ritson (1783, p. 192): “A quibble between ordnance and ecclesiastical decrees. Mr. Steevens is an advocate of the former sense; mr. Theobald for the latter. What happiness, what immortal glory, to be the conciliator of such contending chieftains in criticism!”
This note looks incomplete to me. Check Ritson xerox, now being copied.
1813 Gifford
Gifford
315-16 Gifford (ed. Massinger, 1813, 3:44-5), comparing Ferdinand in The Maid of Honour to Hamlet, says, <n> <p.44> “Massinger had Hamlet in view here. He has, however, improved his sentiments. It is pleasing to </p.44> <p.45> observe, amidst the colluvies [i.e., cesspools] of the times, how free the stream of his poetry runs from every taint of profaneness.” </p.45> </n>.
1875 Marshall
Marshall see 1875, p. 10: remarks on suicide[I prob should clarify this ref or omit it.
315-18 Marshall (1875, p. 125): “The solemn words that follow [quotes 315-16 through self-slaughter] show that Hamlet was no infidel, though his faith was enervated by doubts. There is deep pathos in that cry [continues 316-18]. It is a cry that many of us have uttered in the agonizing perplexity caused by the apparent triumph of Evil around us. It is to be noted how the words here echo the sense. Too much pains cannot be bestowed on the utterance of these lines. I have heard them spoken with such a deep thrill of despair in the voice as to be indeed awful.”
1904 Bradley
Bradley: contra Dowden, ard1, pp. xx - xxi, without attribution; see Wilson, below
315 God, God] Bradley (1904, pp. 123-4) <p. 123> states that while repetitions like this are used by various Shn characters, &#x201C;they are a habit with [Hamlet], &#x201D; and he cites Thrift, thrift, 368; Indeed, indeed [doubled only in F], <p. 123> <p. 124> and other instances to support his point. &#x201C; . . . I am much mistaken if this habit is to be found in any other serious character of Shakespeare. &#x201D; </p. 124>
1989 Cantor
Cantor
315-6 that . . . slaughter] Cantor (1989, rpt. Greenhaven 1999, pp. 118): <p. 118> As lines 655-6 prove, Hamlet is a Christian. The issue comes up when he considers suicide and affects his decisions throughout the play. He cannot, therefore, be a hero as in classical drama. </p. 118> <p. 119> “His belief in the immortality of the soul vastly raises the stakes involved in heroic action, but . . . it simultaneously makes it more difficult to calculate the consequences of such action.”</p. 119>