HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 3274-75 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2951-end ed. Hardin A. Aasand
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
3274-5 how doost thou {sweet} <good> lord? This | might be my Lord such a one, that 
1778 v1778
v1778 :
3274-6 This . . . not] Steevens (ed. 1778) : “So, in (Tim. 1.2.216-18. [570-72]) : —’my lord you gave Good words the other day of a bay courser I rode on; it is yours, because you lik’d it.’”
1785 v1785
v1785 = v1778
3274-6 This . . . not]
1787 ann
ann = v1785
3274-6 This . . . not]
1790 mal
mal = v1785
3274-6 This . . . not]
1793 v1793
v1793 = v1785
3274-6 This . . . not]
1803 v1803
v1803 = v1793
3274-6 This . . . not]
1813 v1813
v1813 = v1803
3274-6 This . . . not]
1819 cald1
cald1 = v1813
3274-6 This . . . not]
1821 v1821
v1821 = cald1
3274-6 This . . . not]
1826 sing1
sing1 = v1821
3274-6 This . . . not]
1832 cald2
cald2 = cald1
3274-6 This . . . not]
1856b sing2
sing2 = sing1
3274-6 This . . . not]
1868 c&mc
c&mc
3274-6 This . . . not] Clarke & Clarke (ed. 1868): “Elliptically constructed; meaning, ‘This might be the pate of my lord such-a-one; . . . . . and is now the property of my Lady Worm.’”
1872 cln1
cln1 : standard
3274-6 This . . . not]
1877 v1877
v1877 :≈ v1821
3274-6 This . . . not]
1882 elze2
elze2
3274 sweet lord] Elze (ed. 1882): “Sweet, in [Q2], may be either a faulty repetition, or an intentional one, that has come from the poet himself.”
1890 irv2
irv2 ≈ v1877
3274-6 This . . . not]
1899 ard1
ard1 : standard
3274-6 This . . . not]
1934 Wilson
Wilson
3274 sweet lord] Wilson (1934, 2:280) prefers F1’s good Lord, adopted by v1821, GLO, v1877 over Q2’s adopted by CAP, JEN, CAM1
3274 sweet lord] Wilson (1934, 2:284): <p. 284> “We cannot be sure that Shakespeare’s word was ‘good’ and not ‘sweet’ here; but consulting once again the context—’Or of a courtier, which could say ‘Good-morrow, sweet lord! How dost thou, good lord!’—we must agree that variation with F1 rather than repetition with Q2 is to be preferred.” </p. 284>
1980 pen2
pen2 ≈ standard
3274-6 This . . . not]
1987 oxf4
oxf4 : ard2 w/o attribution (Tim.//)
3275 my Lord such a one]
3274 3275