HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 1754 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 1018-2022 ed. Eric Rasmussen
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
1754 As made {these} <the> things more rich, {their} <then> perfume {lost,} <left:>3.1.98
1787 ann
ann
1753-1755 And...againe] Henley (1787, pp. 86-87): <p. 86> “The same metaphor is used, but in a different connexion, by Drayton: ‘Shepheard why creepe we in this lowly vaine, As though our muse no store at all affordes, </p. 86><p. 87> Whilst others vaunt it with the frolicke trayne, And strut the stage with reperfumed wordes.’” </p. 87>
1824 farren
farren
1753- 55 Farren (1824, p. 486): “This humiliating declaration, involving at once the sacrifice of delicacy and of truth in the more senseless coqauetry, Hamlet immediately perceives to have been prompted by Polonius, and instantly puts on his fantastic character, the more strongly to impress the King, through the report of Ophelia, with a notion ofhis madness. Unfortunately, the shafts intended for the guilty strike the innocent, and the poor Ophelia suffers all the misery consequent on a belief in her lover’s distraction. If it were proper to digress from the subject immediately under consideration, much might here be said in praise of the extraordinary consistency and merit displayed by the author in developing the different characters of this exquisite tragedy. This one scene exhibits in rapid succession the mental disease, the natural disposition, and the crafty assumption of Hamlet; it as the same time engages our sympathy for Ophelia, and gives a finishing stroke to the inimitable sketch of the court sycophant and favorite.
“How different are the conclusions drawn from the conduct of Hamlet in this scene, but the innocent Maiden and the guilty King.— Ophelia still having confidence in her lover’s affection, for faith is easy when the feart is touched, and being incapable of deceit herself, attributes Hamlet’s extravagance of behaviour to madness.”
1843 col1
col1
1754 Collier (ed. 1843): “So, the quarto,1 604, and every edition in the same form after it: the folios, ‘then perfume left;’ but some modern editors constantly give a false notion of the value and accuracy of the folio, 1623, by adopting, without the slightest acknowledgment, the better readings of the quartos, as if they were really contained in the folio. The folio, 1623, is on the whole a well printed volume, but it has many errors.”
1861 wh1
wh1
1754 White (ed. 1861): “‘---their perfume lost’:--The folio had the manifest misprints, ‘then perfume left.’”
1870 daniel
daniel
1754 Daniel (1870, p. 75): “[their] in second line is upplied from Qos., which also have lost for left. Left, however, is a very good reading, or qy. rest.”
1872 cln1
cln1
1754 their perfume] Clark & Wright (ed. 1872): “the perfume of the words.”
1899 ard1
ard1
their perfume] Dowden (ed. 1899): “the perfume of the gifts, derived form the sweet words.”
1754