HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 1616 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 1018-2022 ed. Eric Rasmussen
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
1616 Hah, {s’wounds} <Why> I should take it: for it cannot be2.2.576
1805 seymour
seymour
1616 Hah,] SEYMOUR (1805, p. 174): “All these interruptions of the metre I take to be the gratuitous ejaculations of the player, among which I include this following: ‘A scullion! —and foh!’”
1872 cln1
cln1
1616 s’wounds] Clark & Wright (ed. 1872): “God’s wounds. For this profane oath the folio has ’why.’ See notes on ii. 1. 76, and ii. 2. 355."
1882 elze
elze
1616 s’wounds] Elze (ed. 1882): “Both Ha and Why are substitutions for the objectionable oath ‘Swounds, the elimination of which has caused an evident confusion in the text, in so far as QB contains the oath as well as its substitute and FA offers two substitutes at one and the same time. Compare notes on § 124 (For womens feare and In neither ought).”
1616