HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 342 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
342 It is not, nor it cannot come to good,1.2.158
1854 del2
del2
342 good] Delius (ed. 1854): “good ist adjectivisch in Bezug auf it is not, substantivisch aber in Verbundung mit come to.” [good is adjectival in service of it is not, but substantive with come to.]
Ed. note: This is a philologist writing.
1870 Abbott
Abbott § 406
342 nor it cannot] Abbott (§ 406): The double negative, very common in E. E., is used in Sh. for emphasis.
1872 cln1
cln1 ≈ Abbott without attribution + marked in magenta underlined
342 nor it cannot] Clark & Wright (ed. 1872): “Observe the double negative, so frequent in older English writers. The latest instance of its use we have noticed in any careful writer, is in Congreve’s Love for Love. iv.4.
1877 v1877
1877 = cln1
342 nor it cannot]
1880 meik
meikcln1 on double negative without attribution + in magenta underlined
342 nor it cannot] Meikeljohn (ed. 1880): “In older English, negatives supported and intensified each other. The annihilation of each other, as in Milton’s Nor did they not perceive him, is a Latin usage, and has been imported into our language.”
1939 kit2
kit2: standard
342 nor it cannot] Kittredge (ed. 1939): "Such double negatives are common."
1987 oxf4
oxf4 = Abbott § 406
342 nor it cannot]
1987 Mercer
Mercer
342 Mercer (1987, p. 152): Because Hamlet in the previous lines settled on a social crime rather than one personal to him, he can end on a calmly sententious note. Mercer’s point is to show how different Hamlet’s language is from the self-lacerating language of the usual revenger. “In the face of so complex a relationship between [Hamlet’s] language and reality it is hard to see how the terrible certainties of revenge can take hold. What place can the world of Hamlet find for that fierce unity of emotion and speech, for the final fusion of bloody words and bloodier deeds . . . . ”
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2
342 nor it cannot] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “an emphatic double negative (Hope, 2.1.9)”
342