HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 3112, etc. - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2951-end ed. Hardin A. Aasand
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
3112+5 {Dies in his owne too much, that we would doe}4.7.118
1562 Heywood
Heywood
3112+5-3112+8 that . . . accedents] Heywood (1562, 1: 3: 8): “He that will not when he may, When he would he shall have nay.”
1805 Chedworth
Chedworth
3112+4-5 For . . . much] Seymour (1805, 2:197):<p. 197>”In his own superfluity or excess.”</p. 197>
1869 tsch
Tsch
3112+5-+6 that . . . would] Tschischwitz (ed. 1869): “Auf dem Satze: That we would do, we should do, when we would; beruht der eigentliche Grundgedanke des Drama’s.” [“The specific, fundamental thought of the play depends on the sentence: [quotes 3112+5-3112+6]

tsch: New Test.; Koch
3112+5 that] Tschischwitz (ed. 1869): “Die Vertauschung von that und what ist nicht sehr gewöhnlich. We speak that we know. John 3: 11. Koch II. §. 361” [“The exchange of that and what is not very typical. We speak that we know. John 3:11. Koch II. § 361.”]
1870 rug1
rug1
3112+5 too much] Moberly (ed. 1870): “Like ‘a great amiss,’ ‘the why and wherefore,’ and the like. English had at this time something like the flexibility of Greek; and had no difficulty in throwing out phrases like [Greek and Greek].”
1873 rug2
rug2= rug1
3112+5 too much] Moberly (ed. 1873):
18?? dyce3
1877 v1877
v1877: tsch; White
3112+5-+8 that . . . accedents] Tschiwschwitz (apud Furness, ed. 1877): “The fundamental idea of the whole tragedy. Grant White (Hamlet the Younger, Galaxy, April, 1870, p. 544) says the same.”

v1877 = rug
3112+5 too much]
[1879] Bullock
Bullock
3112+5-+10 that . . . easing] Bullock ([1879], p. 46) lists this section under precept 31, “Improvement of Present Time.”
1885 Leo
Leo: tsch without attribution
3112+5-+10 that . . . easing] Leo (1885, pp. 93-4): <p. 93>“These words contain the fullest solution of the King’s character as well as of that of Hamlet. How is it possible, reading these lines, to believe that Shakespeare intended to give to the portrait of Hamlet any touch of energy!
“I feel induced here to repeat what I remarked in reviewing (in the Shakespeare Jahrbuch) Mr. Halliwell Phillipps’ Memoranda on the Tragedy of Hamlet: ‘Each period has its individual stamp for every manifestation of intellectual life. The romantic </p. 93> <p. 94> period produces ideal philosophers, while in the time of materialism the realistic philsophers are in season. They are never more than the results and consequences, the reflections of the genius of the age, and while they at the best are nothing but the shade of it, they believe to be its light, nay, even itself! It is the like with the so-called æsthetic criticism. In the romantic period it was able to discover in Hamlet the soul that breaks down under the burden it is charged with; the philosophical dreamer, whose imaginative sphere of thought assumes for him the character of a substantial fact, while the real substantiality of things and actions flutters away before his mind as a mere nothing.” </p. 94>
1931 crg1
crg1 ≈ standard
3112+5 his owne too much]
1934 cam3
cam3: standard
3112+5-+10 that . . . easing] Wilson (ed. 1934): “As many have noted, these words point the whole moral of Hamlet, and are a comment (unconscious on Claud.’s part, but intentional on Sh.’s) upon Ham.’s character, as indeed much of the action in Act 4 is likewise. Cf. Introd. p. lxi.”
1939 kit2
kit2
3112+5 too much] Kittredge (ed. 1939): “its own excess.”

kit2
3112+5 too much] Kittredge (ed. 1939, Glossary): “excess.”

kit2
3112+5 that] Kittredge (ed. 1939): “what”
1947 cln2
cln2 ≈ standard
3112+5-3112+10 Rylands (ed. 1947): “i.e. we ought to put our intentions into action at once.”
cln2 ≈ cam3
3112+5-+10 that . . . easing] Wilson (ed. 1934): “As many have noted, these words point the whole moral of Hamlet, and are a comment (unconscious on Claud.’s part, but intentional on Sh.’s) upon Ham.’s character, as indeed much of the action in Act 4 is likewise. Cf. Introd. p. lxi.
1951 crg2
crg2=crg1
3112+5 his owne too much]
1974 evns1
evns1 ≈ standard
3112+5 too much]
1980 pen2
pen2 ≈ standard
3112+5-3112+10
pen2
3112+5 his] Spencer (ed. 1980): “its”
1988 bev2
bev2 ≈ standard (kit2)
3112+5 his owne too much]
bev2 ≈ standard (kit2)
3112+5 that]
3112+5 3112+6