HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 2272 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 2023-2950 ed. Frank N. Clary
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
2272 King. I like him not, nor stands it safe with vs3.3.1
1753-4 Lennox
Lennox
2272- Lennox (1753, pp. 272-3): <p.272> “The Madness of Hamlet seems to be less essential to the Play than the History; in the latter it affords him the Means of executing a Contrivance, which, absurd as it is, secures the Accomplishment of his Revenge; but in the Play it is of no other Use than to inliven the Dialogue, unless its Usefulness may be deduced from its bringing on such Accidents as it was assumed to prevent; for Hamlet’s Mad- </p.272><p.273> ness alarms the King’s Suspicion, and that produces the treacherous Embassy to England, which failing, the Contrivance of the Rapier followed, and that does the Business.
“But since the King’s conscious Guilt and Terror might reasonably have created a Distrust of Hamlet, and that Distrust, and a Desire of security induced him to seek his Death, what need had Shakespear to make his Hero’s Sense and Discretion appear doubtful, by shewing him feigning a Madness, destructive to his Safety, and which he himself knows to be so, and yet persists in.
Shakespear has indeed followed the History in making Hamlet feign himself mad; but that Madness being of no Consequence to the principal Design of the Play, as it is in the History, or if of Consequence it hurts the Reputation of his Hero, ‘tis certainly a Fault; for at least he only produces the same Events by a Blunder, which might have happened without it.” </p.273>
1819 cald1
cald1
2272 stands . . . vs] Caldecott (ed. 1819): “Is it consistent with our security.”
1832 cald2
cald2 = cald1
1912 dtn
dtn
2272-3 I like . . . range] Deighton (ed. 1912): “I do not like the look of things as regards him, nor is it safe for us to allow his madness to have free scope; his madness, him who is mad; you, reflective.”
1929 trav
trav
2272 him] Travers (ed. 1929): “the look of him, the impression he makes on me.”
1934 cam3
cam3
2272-2300 Wilson (ed. 1934): “That the K. should thus openly speak with Roc. and Guild. of this danger from Ham. is proof that the Gonzago play was recognised by all as a threat to his life; cf. note [3.2.243 (2139)].”
1939 kit2
kit2
2272 I like him not] Kittredge (ed. 1939): “I do not like the way he is acting.”
kit2
2272 with vs] Kittredge (ed. 1939): “The royal we—‘with me the King.’”
1947 cln2
cln2: xref.
2272-99 Rylands (ed. 1947): “The first twenty lines of the scene show that Hamlet’s ‘lunacy’ can now be considered a State matter. Clearly the king is threatened, ‘upon whose weal depend and rest the lives of many’ [3.3.14-5 (2287-8)]. Claudius is justified in hastening Hamlet’s virtual banishment under the surveillance of the two courtiers. After the busy-body Polonius has reported that the Prince is going to his mother and that he will take note of all that occurs, Claudius is left alone. We see him for the first as a private man and he wins our sympathy, with the result that Hamlet’s speech as he observes him at his prayers strikes us with deeper horror. The dramatic dilemma which Shakespeare has achieved is acute. For a single moment he makes us feel that Claudius is nearer salvation than the hero, and that feeling helps to keep the balance of our sympathies even.”
1947 yal2
yal2
2272 like him not] Cross & Brooke (ed. 1947): “distrust him.”
1974 evns1
evns1
2272 him] Evans (ed. 1974): “i.e. his state of mind, his behavior.”
1980 pen2
pen2
2272 like him not] Spencer (ed. 1980): “am nervous about his actions and intentions.”
1982 ard2
ard2
2272 nor stands it safe] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “The King, having learnt from the play that his crime is known, has every reason to fear Hamlet’s revenge; and though the others cannot see what he sees, there was still ample in the play and in Hamlet’s comments on it to persuade them that the King is in danger from his nephew.”
1984 klein
klein: xrefs.; evns1
2272 I like him not] Klein (ed. 1984): “Just conceivably, as has at times been assumed, the normal sense = ’I am not fond of him’. However, such a hostile remark would not fit the role of the anxious prince and (step)father, which Claudius has throughout adopted (until he is alone). Nothing points to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern either here or later knowing anything of Claudius’s murderous plan (it may be doubted anyway whether it exists already at this point), note also [4.3.56 (2721)], [5.2.17 (3517)] f. (the commission is sealed), and the King has every reason not to create accomplices that are in the know; he does this only in the last phase of the play, under enormous pressure when his hand is forced). Here he keeps up the fiction of Hamlet’s madness, linking to it the latter’s public threat to him and hence the necessary measures. I like him not, therefore, ‘i.e. his state of mind, his behaviour’ (Evans), or rather: ‘I am worried about his condition.’”
1988 bev2
bev2 ≈ evns1
2272 him] Bevington (ed. 1988): “i.e., his behavior.”
1997 evns2
evns2 = evns1
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2 ≈ bev2
2272 him] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “his condition or behaviour.”

ard3q2 ≈ cald1
2272 nor . . . us] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “and it is not consistent with our (my) safety.”
2272