1211 F
ishmonger ]
Jenkins (ed. 1982): "The shattering incongruity of calling
Polonius a fishmonger wins an inevitable laugh, establishes Hamlet’s ’madness’, and might be point enough. But, Kittredge notwithstanding, it is natural to suspect some further implication. The view of Coleridge and others that Hamlet gibes at
Polonius for fishing (for information) has provoked the just objection that fishing is no what a fishmonger does. Contemporary references make it easier to see that there was a joke attached to a fishmonger, and especially to having a fishmonger for your father, than to grasp what the joke was. Malone, citing Barnabe Rich,
The Irish Hubbub (’him that they call
Senex Fornicator, an old Fishmonger, that many years since engrossed the French pox . . . ’) is certainly right to say that a fishmonger could mean a wencher (see also
Trivium, III, 94-100), which is a secondary meaning here (cf. l. 176n.). But a fishmonger was not only given to venery ; he was the cause of venery in others. It is generally supposed, though the evidence falls well short of proof (see Shaaber,
SQ, XXII, 179-81, but in support
“M. C. Andrews in
Renaiss.
Papers, 1977, pp. 59-68), that a fishmonger, like a flesh-monger, was a trader in women’s virtue, i.e. a bawd ; and this sense too, as Dover Wilson insists, has its aptness here when
Polonius is planning to ’loose’ his daughter to the prince. But more to the present point is the belief that the trade of the fishmonger was a particular stimulus to breeding, as is suggested by a remarkable passage in Sir Hugh Platt’s
The Jewel House (1594) : ’Salt doth greatly further procreation, for it doth not only stir up lust, but it doth also minister fruitfulness . . . And Plutarch doth witness that ships upon the seas are pestered and poisoned oftentimes with exceeding store of mice. And some hold opinion that the females, without any copulation with the males, do conceive only by licking salt. And this maketh the fishmongers’ wives so wanton and so beautiful.’ This was tentatively cited by Dowden, seemingly without a full grasp of its relevance ; but if we perceive that the connection of ideas is salt, sea, fertility of mice at sea, fishmongers’ wives, we shall also see that fishmongers’ wives, simultaneously beautiful and wanton (cf. III. i. 107-14), are not only seductive but fertile. And (with daughter for wife and delivery for conception) this is obviously the point of Venus’s remark, in Jonson’s
Christmas Masque, about the birth of her son Cupid, ’He came a month before his time . . . but I was a fishmonger’s daughter’. Fishmonger’s daughters, it appears, equally with fishmonger’s wives, had advantages in the matter of procreation. Hence the deeper significance of
fishmonger here is to introduce the sequence fishmonger>daughter>breeding (conception). Thoughts of mating and breeding, focusing on
Ophelia, are seen to haunt Hamlet’s mind. this ’method’ of exploiting his madness does not of course imply that Hamlet must be aware of
Polonius’s plan for
Ophelia ; to suppose so would be to misunderstand the ’method’. What Hamlet
is all the time (even obsessively) aware of is that
Polonius is
Ophelia’s father. Cf. below ll. 399ff., where, with the fishmonger and his daughter replaced by Jephthah and
his daughter, the same question is raised, about the fate of
Polonius’s daughter, through the converse illustration. All this prepares for the putting of the question to
Ophelia herself (III. i. 121-2). For fuller discussion, see ’Hamlet and the Fishmonger’,
Sh. Jahr. (West), 1975, 109-29. Cf. Intro., pp. 150-1."