HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 337 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
337 Then I to Hercules, within a month,1.2.153
337 338 377 1408 2440 2441 3490
1816 Gifford
Gifford
337 Hercules] Gifford (1816, 2:13) cites Whalley, a former editor of Jonson: “‘Among the ancients, everything bold and undaunted was termed Herculean: thus Justin, in the preface to his Epitome, ascribes the intrepidity of Hercules to Trogus Pompeius: Nonne nobis, Pompeius Herculea audacia orbem terrarum adgressus videri debet?Whal
1874 Corson
Corson: F1; cam1 +
337-8 within , , , yet] Corson (1874, p. 10): “The meaning is, Within a month [did I say]? [Yes] Ere yet etc.”
1878 rlf1
rlf1: xref to 1408
337 Hercules] Rolfe (ed. 1878): “Allusions to Hercules are very common in S.”
1899 ard1
ard1
337 Hercules] Dowden (ed. 1899) refers to the ending of Saxo’s work, which compares Amleth to Hercules.
1929 trav
trav
337 Then . . . Hercules] Travers (ed. 1929) asserts that the comparison may not be merely physical, for Hercules rid the world of evils. He cites Marston’s Antonio’s Revenge 5.2: “‘Thou art another Hercules to us, In ridding huge pollution from our state;’ and Hamlet is far from imagining such power in himself [885-6].” But with Burbage as the actor, and considered Hamlet’s physical abilities expressed elsewhere in the play, it’s not likely that Hamlet gave an impression of physical weakness.
1931 Waldock
Waldock: contra Goethe; Coleridge
337-41 within a month . . . incestious sheets] Waldock (1931, p. 15): “ . . . Hamlet has just suffered a really tremendous emotional shock . . . . It is made perfectly clear to us, in short, that the Hamlet who is called upon to avenge his father’s murder is . . . in an altogether exceptional condition of soul.” Yet both Goethe and Coleridge ignore what preceded the ghost’s demand.
1936 cam3b
cam3b: Travers
337 Hercules] Wilson (ed. 1936, rpt. 1954, add. notes): “Travers notes that Hamlet thinks of Hercules rather as the purifier of the world than as the strong man, and quotes Antonio’s Revenge, 5.2: ‘Thou art another Hercules to us In ridding huge pollution from our state.’ This has the great merit of freeing us from the necessity of supposing that Ham. regards himself as a weakling—which he certainly was not.”
1939 kit2
kit2: focus on physical
337 Then I to Hercules] Kittredge (ed. 1939): "A suggestion as to Hamlet’s personal appearance. He is strong and active—a good fencer— but not stalwart [i.e. stout, sturdy, strong]."
1946 Granville-Barker
Granville-Barker: contra opinion that marriage has just taken place
337 within a month] Granville-Barker (1946, 1: 53 n. 9): “It can be assumed that the marriage has only just taken place ’within a month,’ that is to say, of the funeral, which was itself delayed a little less than a month. But I think the intention is clearly otherwise. ’Within a month . . . she married’: the past definite tense does not properly apply to yesterday or the day before, The importance of the point is that Hamlet is not here presented as a man suffering under a quite recent chock (we shall see the effect on him of a severer one later). He has been brooding over the miserable business for the best part of a month.” Ed. note: Because this is a footnote, G-B probably wrote it for the 1946 rpt. He may be responded to Waldock 1931.
1958 fol1
fol1: standard
337 Hercules] Wright & LaMar (ed. 1958): “the superman of classical mythology.”
1980 pen2
pen2
337 Then I to Hercules] Barton (ed. 1980, pp. 20-1) <p. 20> declares that Sh. in several plays, including Hamlet, places a heroic age in the past. Ham. speaks here of himself and his father as coming from different worlds. </p. 20> <p. 21> “There is more than mere filial loyalty and pride in Hamlet’s comparison of the former King to Mars [2441] and Hyperion [2440], or his sad recognition that ‘I shall not look upon his like again’ [377].” Horatio, she says, makes King Hamlet into an icon.” </p. 21>
1980 pen2
pen2
337 Hercules] Spencer (ed. 1980): “The amount of classical allusion (Hyperion, satyr, Niobe, Hercules) by the university-educated Hamlet is doubtless intended to be a character-indication.”
1982 ard2
ard2: Ham. varies from sources
337 Hercules] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “who performed superhuman tasks. Already, before his task has come to him, Hamlet gives an indication of his feeling of inadequacy. This is the more significant in that he is made to negative in advance a comparison found in earlier versions of the story. Saxo concluded that if fortune had been as kind to him as nature, he would have outdone the labours of Hercules; and Belleforest likened him to Samson, the ’Hercules of the Hebrews’”
1987 oxf4
oxf4: Jenkins; xref 510-14: Abbott § 415
337 I to Hercules] Hibbard (ed. 1987): "Does Hamlet mean that he is not of heroic physical proportions; that he is incapable, as Jenkins suggests, of performing superhuman tasks; that he does not share Hercules’ appetite for ‘weeding’ monsters from the garden of the world; or that he is not supremely virtuous (see note to 1.3.47-51)?"
1992 fol2
fol2
337 Hercules] Mowat & Werstine (ed. 1992): “in Greek mythology, a hero of extraordinary strength and courage”
1993 Lupton&Reinhard
Lupton & Reinhard
337 Lupton & Reinhard (1993, p. 111, n. 21): “Hamlet’s refusal of the role of Hercules, the titular character of two plays attributed to Seneca, manipulates mythological tags in Senecan style in order to distinguish himself from the bloody heroics of the earlier dramatist. Cf. Braden, Renaissance Tragedy 218.”
See also 1408, where the allusion to Hercules could also be to Senecan plays on stage in 1600, and 3490
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2: Bullough; Miola
337 Hercules] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “At this point, Hamlet sees himself as quite unlike this mythical hero, famous for his twelve superhuman ’labours’ which included killing the many-headed Hydra and relieving Atlas of his burden, the globe, while Atlas stole the golden apples of the Hesperides . . . . Later, he seems prepared to vie with Hercules (see [670]). The story of Amleth as told by Saxo Grammaticus ends with a complimentary version of the same comparison: ’Had fortune been as kind to [[Amleth]] as nature, he would have equalled the gods in glory, and surpassed the labours of Hercules by his deeds of prowess’ (Bullough 7.79); in his more prolix version, Belleforest cmpares Hamblet with Hercules twice (Bullough 7.118, 123). Miola (Tragedy) argues, however, that Shakespeare may be drawing on Seneca’s Hercules Furens (see pp. 70-1).”