HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 285 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
285 To reason most absurd, whose common theame 1.2.103
1747 warb
Warb
285 reason] Warburton (ed. 1747): “Reason, for experience.”
Ed. note: OED does not have this definition. The def. is more likely 10a “intellectual power of mankind” or 11a “ordinary thinking faculty.”
1753 blair
blair = warb
285 reason]
1765 john1
john1 = warb +
285 reason] Johnson (ed. 1765): “Reason is here used in its common sense, for the faculty by which we form conclusions from arguments.”
Ed. note: Without explicitly disagreeing john offers an alternative def close to OED 11a.
1773 v1773
v1773 = john1
285 reason]
1778 v1778
v1778 = v1773
285 reason]
1785 v1785
v1785 = john1 minus warb
285 reason]
1787 ann
ann = v1785
285 reason]
1790 mal
mal = v1785
285 reason]
1793 v1793
v1793 = mal
285 reason]
1803 v1803
v1803 = v1793
285 reason]
1813 v1813
v1813= v1803
285 reason]
1821 v1821
v1821 = v1813
285 reason]
1939 kit2
kit2: standard
285 whose] Kittredge (ed. 1939): "The antecedent seems to be nature rather than reason."

kit2: standard
285 common theame] Kittredge (ed. 1939): "for the natural order of things proclaims that death must be the universal lot of mankind."
1980 pen2
pen2
285-6 whose . . . who] Spencer (ed. 1980): “(reason).”
1982 ard2
ard2: kit2; Abbott
285-6 whose . . . who] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “ ’The antecedent seems to be nature rather than reason’ (Kittredge). For the use of who to refer to personified abstractions, see Abbott 264.”
1987 oxf4
oxf4 = Abbott § 264
285-6 whose . . . who]
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2
285 whose] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “i.e. nature’s ”

ard3q2
285 theame] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “topic”
285