121 to 130 of 540 Entries from All Files for "johnson" in All Fields
... a> </ehline> <cn><sigla>1755<tab> </tab>Johnson Dict.</sigla><hanging>Johnson</h ...
... ab> </tab>Johnson Dict.</sigla><hanging>Johnson</hanging><para>753<tab> </tab><b ...
... ara>753<tab> </tab><b>possesse</b>] <sc>Johnson</sc> (1755): “3. To make ...
... er of.” See Nares. The only uses Johnson records are with a preposition</ ...
... ess</i> possible in 753.</para><hanging>Johnson</hanging><para>753<tab> </tab><b ...
... ara>753<tab> </tab><b>possesse</b>] <sc>Johnson </sc>(1755) on <i>posset </i>as ...
... tab> </tab>Nares</sigla><hanging>Nares: Johnson +</hanging><para>753<tab> </tab> ...
... early the same as the third sense in <i>Johnson</i>, but without a preposition.& ...
... noun B&F <i>Hon. Man's F.</i>]. See Johnson [probably dictionary].”</ ...
... </para></cn> <cn><sigla>1755<tab> </tab>Johnson Dict.</sigla><hanging>Johnson</h ...
... ab> </tab>Johnson Dict.</sigla><hanging>Johnson</hanging><para>754<tab> </tab><b ...
... ><para>754<tab> </tab><b>eager</b>] <sc>Johnson</sc> (1755) defines “Sha ...
... ester</sigla><hanging>Rochester ≈ Johnson without attribution </hanging><p ...
... </para></cn> <cn><sigla>1755<tab> </tab>Johnson Dict.</sigla><hanging>Johnson</h ...
... ab> </tab>Johnson Dict.</sigla><hanging>Johnson</hanging><para>756<tab> </tab><b ...
... <para>756<tab> </tab><b>tetter</b>] <sc>Johnson</sc> (1755): “A scab; a s ...
... Ham. </i></para> <para><b>Ed. note:</b> Johnson defines <i>scurf </i>(see Valpy) ...
... ara>762<tab> </tab><b>vnanueld</b>] <sc>Johnson</sc> (ed. 1765): “This is ...
... 62<tab> </tab><b>disappointed </b>] <sc>Johnson</sc> (ed. 1765): “<i>Disa ...
... has been given up by <small>M</small>r. Johnson, with <small>many</small> others ...
... for <i>unannointed</i>: “<i>Mr. Johnson reads </i>disappointed<i>, in th ...
... pointment of Penance by the Church.</i> Johnson reads DIS<i>appointed</i>; which ...
... ells us, it means <i>no Knell rung</i>. Johnson owns Theobald's Objection to thi ...
... neal'd</i>, <i>unctus</i>. I agree with Johnson, that Sir Thomas Hanmer's Explic ...
... c>Steevens</sc> (ed. 1773): “Dr. Johnson's explanation of the word <i>dis ...
... ston]: <sc>Pope</sc>, Theobald, Hanmer, Johnson +</hanging><para>762<tab> </tab> ...
... passage, which has been given up by Dr. Johnson, with some others of the critics ...
... para><n><p.456> ‡ Dr. Johnson reads <i>disappointed</i>, in th ...
... , Spelman (1626), Hanmer, Theobald, Dr. Johnson +</hanging><para>762<tab> </tab> ...
... has been invalidated by the learned Dr. Johnson, who, after having given the not ...
... ld came closest to explaining the word, Johnson was not convinced. Brand suggest ...
... has been invalidated by the learned Dr. Johnson, who, after having given the not ...
... he “blood for blood” that Johnson believes should content him. See ...
... till this sense was ascertained. See <i>Johnson</i>. But, that there is no real ...
... n giving <i>disappointed</i>, which Dr. Johnson is willing to understand as mean ...
... ted</i>, which immediately precedes it. Johnson suggested <i>un-knell'd, </i>tha ...
... understand this word; he says that even Johnson (among others) professed to be u ...
... endix</hanging><para><sc>765<tab> </tab>Johnson </sc>(ed. 1765, 8: L12v): ȁ ...
... : “The lady who suggested to Dr. Johnson that this line belongs to Hamlet ...
... sc>col1</sc> </sigla><hanging><sc>col1: Johnson </sc>[<i>erroneously</i>]</hangi ...
... the quarto, 1603. One reason stated by Johnson for assigning it to the hero was ...
... te:</b> Collier is wrong on two counts: Johnson was not the one who recommended ...
... his line as part of the Ghost's speech. Johnson thought it should be transferred ...
... i>. It had long since been suggested to Johnson that it evidently belongs to <i> ...
... s speech in all the old copies; but Dr. Johnson thought, with reason, that it sh ...
... dy,' probably Mrs Montagu, suggested to Johnson that this line ‘O, horribl ...
... ): <sc>“</sc>Beyond question, as Johnson saw, this exclamation belongs to ...
... 1</sc> also gets it wrong; it's not<sc> Johnson</sc> but an unnamed lady (see <s ...
... s point). Editors have conjectured that Johnson's lady was either Elizabeth Mont ...
... <i>eyes.' </i>‘I know not,' says Johnson, ‘how Shakspeare, <i>who c ...
... <i>eyes</i>, which is only in his tail. Johnson's note is a very proper one, the ...
... para> <para>See CN 771 for remainder of Johnson's note.</para></cn> <cn> <sigla> ...
... 819<tab> </tab><b>circumstance</b>] <sc>Johnson</sc> (ed. 1765, 7:482, n.2), for ...
... ly one of the aspects of his style that Johnson deplored.</para></cn> <cn> <sigl ...
... Upton; : Garrick</hanging><para>842 <sc>Johnson</sc> (ed. 1765): “I was o ...
... 1C;‘Swear by my Sword': A Note in Johnson's <i>Shakespeare</i>.” <i ...
... k to their swords, and that may be what Johnson was recollecting. But it's equal ...
... ecting. But it's equally plausible that Johnson mistook the passage that Garrick ...
... is is the only spot in all his Sh. that Johnson refers to “Garrick by nam ...
... rs swearing by swords or anything else, Johnson has no note (207-8). </para></cn ...
... Dr. Gray.”</sc></para> <para><sc>Johnson</sc> adds: “This note, wh ...
... on this passage, in the last edition of Johnson and Steevens, 1778, that I shall ...