<< Prev 1.. 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 ..117 Next >> 261 to 270 of 1169 Entries from All Files for "shakes" in All Fields
Contract Context Printing 160 characters of context... Expand Context ... might be better to read—<i>Addition</i>. Titles of honour were called in Shakespear's time, very commonly, <i> Additions</i>: and he uses the word in thi ...
... unkenness [. . . ]. Probably here, as certainly [in <i>Oth. </i>2.3.76 (1188)], Shakespeare is rebuking this vice in his own countrymen."</para></cn> <cn> <sig ...
... 4<tab> </tab>indeede] <sc>Kittredge</sc> (ed. 1939): "Used (as almost always in Shakespeare) in the strong sense of 'in point of fact.' " </para></cn> <cn> <si ...
... 2d) show how well established this phrase had become in the 16th century before Shakespeare adopted it here and gave it a still wider currency."</para> <br/><h ...
... 1+22<tab> </tab><sc>Teichmann </sc> (1880, p. 5): “Now it is a fact that Shakespeare, in general, kept close to his sources, and as the French translatio ...
... und only one passage where there is a closer relation in the expression between Shakespeare and the tale; and this one speaks against Saxo. It is . . . ‘T ...
... akes us traduc'd and tax'd of other nations: They clepe us drunkards etc.' This Shakespearean reflexion is to be found in the translation, but not in Saxo's tex ...
... <sigla>1902<tab></tab><tab></tab>Reed</sigla> <hanging>Reed: claims Bacon is Shakespeare, supported by <i>Promus</i> notebooks begun Dec. 1594.</hanging> <p ...
... c> (1902, § 110): “The origin of this sentiment, at least so far as Shakespeare's expression of it is concerned, seems to have been in Dante's 'Conv ...
... nvoluted sentence that makes up this speech, asks, “Is it not clear that Shakespeare <i>meant</i> for Hamlet to speak in this labyrinthine manner? Did h ...
... et keeps on talking, his mind is not on what he is saying? Furthermore, did not Shakespeare intend for the audience to lose the thought in the maze of the sente ...
... ion anxiously to the appearance of the ghost? The sentence, I believe, shows us Shakespeare, the conscious artist, seeking to reveal the mental state of the spe ...
... ees and dregs, dead and unregarded of any man.' What Nashe says of drunkenness, Shakespeare extends from drunkenness to any vice. On his indebtedness Nashe see ...
... f the expression are complex. It has been argued, especially by those who think Shakespeare intended to delete these lines, that he gave up on the speech, leavi ...
... serves attention as an example of an unrevised draft, illustrating perhaps that Shakespeare wrote in phrases and metre first and left sorting out the structure ...
... nnens</sc> (ed. 1773): “<i>T</i>[heobald] would have it <i>mould</i>. <i>Shakespeare restored</i>, p. 33.”</para> <para>Like <sc>Heath</sc>, ignor ...
... ite whatever else his appearance might testify of his good qualities. . . . For Shakespeare's age . . . the reputation of the man concerned would be destroyed b ...
... extion</b>] <sc>Hibbard</sc> (ed. 1987): "dominant element in a man's make-up. Shakespeare alludes to the old idea, still current in his time, that a man's tem ...
... ns</sc> (ed. 1982): “Onions cites this as one of only three instances in Shakespeare in which habit has its ordinary modern sense of 'settled practice'. ...
... 'plausive words' of <i>AWW</i> 1.2.53, where the sense (though unknown outside Shakespeare) is usually and reasonably taken to be 'deserving of applause'. The ...
... “for <i>approvable: </i>another instance of the usage, so frequent in <i>Shakespeare</i>, of the active form with the passive sense. See page 66, note 4. ...
... ra>621+14<tab></tab>plausiue manners] <sc>Joseph</sc> (1953, p. 15): “In Shakespeare's day, as in the eighteenth century, 'plausive manners' involved a v ...
... > in [621+13], since <i>habit</i> usually means 'dress' rather than 'custom' in Shakespeare)”</para> <br/> <hanging><sc>ard3q2</sc> : standard </hangi ...
... here: ‘Their <i>Virtues else, </i>&c. Not but it is frequent with <i>Shakespeare<sc>, </sc></i>whether thro' Negligence, or Licentiousness, to change ...
... ;Theobald's correction [Their] for ‘His' of the quartos, which after all Shakespeare may have inadvertently written.”</para></cn> <cn> <sigla>1877 ...
... </tab><b>Their</b>] <sc>Dowden</sc> (ed. 1899): “<i>His </i>of Q may be Shakespeare's word, though grammatically incorrect.”</para></cn> <cn> <si ...
... r to pass from the plural to the singular. He is thinking of himself, or rather Shakespeare is asking us to think of him . . . .”</para> </cn> <cn> <sigl ...
... c> (ed. 1980): “So Q2, and probably the shift from plural to singular is Shakespeare's; but some editors emend to 'Their'.”</para> <br/> <hanging ...
... sc> (ed. 1987): "Probably influenced by ‘the stamp of <i>one</i> defect', Shakespeare seems to have forgotten that his subject, ‘these men, is plura ...
... out better authority than the mere conjecture of a critick, to be fathered upon Shakespear. I should rather suspect the poet might have written, ‘<i>Doth ...
... ion; scarce English, or at least such bald English as should not be father'd on Shakespeare by meer conjecture; and then proceeds to offer two of his own, the f ...
... tions, or changing either of these pronouns <i>ad libitum</i>, were frequent in Shakespeare and his contemporaries. We have the use of the personal pronoun for ...
... 201C;The word <i>eale</i>, as in the quarto, is according to the orthography of Shakespeare's time: <i>Of a doubt To, </i>for <i>over dough To</i>, is evidently ...
... tions, or changing either of these pronouns <i>ad libitum</i>, were frequent in Shakespeare and his contemporaries. We have the use of the personal pronoun for ...
... in the quarto of 1605. </para> <para>“<i>Dull </i>is a favourite word of Shakespeare's; and surely it makes at least as good sense as any of the other re ...
... <sc>Dyce </sc>(ed. 1857): “The editor of the last ed. of the <i>Variorum Shakespeare</i> [v1821] allowed this passage to stand uncorrected: I follow his ...
... C;doubt,” with the signification of turn, pervert, corrupt, or the like. Shakespeare's meaning evidently is, that a little leaven leavens the whole lump, ...
... ne vice will ruin the otherwise perfect character.'—Mr. Singer (in his <i>Shakespeare</i>, 1826) gives, ‘<i>the dram of </i>bale<i> Doth all the nob ...
... —The above conjecture of Mason (which is not mentioned in the <i>Variorum Shakespeare</i>) was unknown to the Rev. J. Mitford, when he wrote to me as foll ...
... to ‘eale” is to <i>reproach</i>: it may be asked, then,—did Shakespeare (who occasionally has provincialisms) write here ‘<i>the dram ...
... most thence my natue is subdu'd, To what it works in, like the dyer's hand.' <i>Shakespeare's Sonnets</i>. ‘Her infinite cunning, with her modern grace, S ...
... than was taken with the will, in the ‘<i>Tale of a Tub.</i>' Now, I think Shakespeare's meaning is made clear enough by the words as they stand: ‘<i ...
... <sc>Dyce </sc>(ed. 1866): “The editor of the last ed. of the <i>Variorum Shakespeare</i> allowed this passage to stand uncorrected: I follow his example; ...
... C;doubt,” with the signification of turn, pervert, corrupt, or the like. Shakespeare's meaning evidently is, that a little leaven leavens the whole lump, ...
... he otherwise perfect character.'—<small> The Rev. W. H. Arrowsmith (in <i>Shakespeare's Editors and Commentators, </i>p. 6) cites the passage thus, ‘ ...
... </i>often draw<i> To his own scandal.'</i>— </small>Mr. Singer (in his <i>Shakespeare</i>, 1826) gives, ‘<i>the dram of </i>bale<i> Doth all the nob ...
... —The above conjecture of Mason (which is not mentioned in the <i>Variorum Shakespeare</i>) was unknown to the Rev. J. Mitford, when he wrote to me as foll ...
... to ‘eale” is to <i>reproach</i>: it may be asked, then,—did Shakespeare (who occasionally has provincialisms) write here ‘<i>the dram ...
... that eale as a verb is Devonshire for to reproach. It might have been heard by Shakespeare in his country strollings, but being put into the mouth of Hamlet, I ...
... entioned, accepts Mr. Dyce's emendation—[quotes].</para> <para>“If Shakespeare wrote ‘oft debase' it is not easy to imagine by what mistake o ...
... 3473], which is said to mean vinegar? In that case we may perhaps imagine that Shakespeare wrote the next line—‘Doth all the noble substance <i>ove ...
... aphor being the same as that used in [quotes 753-4]. </para> <para>“Thus Shakespeare would mean to say here, ‘the small quantity of vinegar or othe ...
... t from any I have seen. <i>Evil </i> is used by the Elizabethan writers, and by Shakespare himself, as a monosyllable, and it would then be pronouned <i>eale, < ...
... tance.' This is in fact the same statement as that made by Maplett, a writer of Shakespearian age, whose assertion evidently embodies a popular supersition, pre ...
... </para> <para>Rosssetti's note, “The ‘Edinburgh Review” and Shakespeare” <i>N&Q </i> 4 ser. 4 (30 Oct. 1869): 367-8.</para></cn> ...
... seems to have been a favourite one with the writers of the Elizabethan period. Shakespeare, who so rarely repeats himself, uses it in two other places. In [<i> ...
... s own scandal. In regard of the uses of ‘of' and ‘to,' see Abbott's Shakespearean Grammar, rev. and enl. ed. §§ 171 and 186.” </par ...
... e use of any noun, adjective, or neuter verb, as an active verb. * See Abbott's Shakespearean Grammar.”</small></p. 14></para> <para><n.*>< ...
... d the word <i>base</i>, though we have no instance of such a use of the word in Shakespeare. There is no need of any change, The word <i>eale</i>, with the mean ...
... 16;A little <i>leaven</i> leaveneth the whole lump.' As to drown, it is used by Shakespeare in the sense of ‘o'erwhelm,' ‘extinguish,' and can be ju ...
... drowns' is plainly more suitable, it may hence reasonably be questioned whether Shakespeare ever wrote <i>doubts</i> in either, all being typographical blunders ...
... n either, all being typographical blunders. These are the only four passages in Shakespeare where the word ‘douts or doubts' occurs, and in all of them it ...
... i>eale; </i>but I doubt whether <i>yeast </i>was ever used for <i>leaven </i>in Shakespeare's time: certainly he does not use it so anywhere else.”</para ...
... ></cn> <cn> <sigla>1902<tab></tab>Reed</sigla> <hanging>Reed: claims Bacon is Shakespeare, supported by <i>Promus</i> notebooks begun Dec. 1594.</hanging> <p ...
... is hardly worth consideration, in spite of the Scottish ‘deil' for devil. Shakespeare was writing English; and the notion that <i>e'il</i> was used for me ...
... rdles it all.' </para> <para>“That the operation of acids on mild was in Shakespeare's mind at the time is shown by [754].</para> <para>“D. ‘ ...
... greement of pronoun and antecedent], is more licentious writing, but thoroughly Shakespearean in style. <sc>H. K. St. J. S</sc>.”</para> <para>BWK: The u ...
... has. I agree fully that ‘eale' is a most improbable form of ‘e'il.' Shakespeare, writing for Londoners, would hardly use the Scotticism, anyway, or ...
... terest and literary capital in the Elizabethan time, and it would be exactly in Shakespeare's fashion to annex a bit of its terminology, and in addition these t ...
... </para> <para>“This is an old-fashioned way of cheese-making in vogue in Shakespeare's time, and the simile would be generally understood.</para> <para>& ...
... <p. 25> calls this crux “the most famous of its kind in the whole Shakespearian canon.” </p. 25> Later <p. 320> he wonders at t ...
... <sc>Harrison</sc> (ed. 1957): “This is the most disputed passage in all Shakespeare. Though the text is corrupt, the meaning is clear: 'a small proport ...
... t into disrepute. This passage, in Q2 only, is probably the most famous crux in Shakespeare. Q2 <i>eale</i> is usually regarded as corrupt, even by those b hav ...
... ell as twice in the manuscript of <i>Sir Thomas More</i> in what we take to be Shakespeare's own hand (Malone Society Reprint, Addn lines 176, 179). As there w ...
... e general sense of the passage; but there are difficulties about attributing to Shakespeare in this context a hypothetical variant (<i>eale</i>) of a dialectal ...
... tence is complete: this is to confuse the distinction between life and fiction. Shakespeare does not deliberately write two lines of nonsense. To take <i>doubt< ...
... ion to the reading adopted here. To object to <i>often</i> on the grounds that Shakespeare is referring to something that <i>invariably</i> happens is to igno ...
... exist, and that is to accept 'dram of eale' and 'of a doubt' as the language of Shakespeare. I would begin by arguing that the Second Quarto should be the copy- ...
<< Previous Results
Next Results >>
All Files Commentary Notes
Material Textual Notes Immaterial Textual Notes
Surrounding Context
Range of Proximity searches